QVML vs. UGA
QVML (Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - QVML is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value &Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QVML returned 21.14%/yr vs 18.95%/yr for UGA. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QVML charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
QVML vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVML achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.
QVML
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- 24.15%
- 3Y*
- 21.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
QVML vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVML Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 8.76% | 17.74% | 25.87% | 22.19% | -16.25% | 12.72% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 13.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVML and UGA is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.09 |
The correlation between QVML and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVML vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
QVML
UGA
QVML vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QVML | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 3.17 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.59 | 9.39 | +3.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QVML vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVML drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVML and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVML | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.52% | -86.59% | +63.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -18.96% | +10.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.71% | -26.68% | +7.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.73% | -18.05% | +15.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -36.69% | +31.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 6.43% | -4.51% |
Volatility
QVML vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) is 4.54%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that QVML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVML | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 9.24% | -4.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 30.57% | -20.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 35.22% | -23.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 34.45% | -17.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 37.22% | -20.61% |
QVML vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVML has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVML vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVML Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 1.03% | 1.10% | 1.15% | 1.43% | 1.72% | 0.62% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVML and UGA have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to QVML (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVML dropped -23.52% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 3-year performance, QVML leads with 21.14% vs 18.95% for UGA. On fees, QVML is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, QVML has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QVML has performed better with a 21.14% return vs 18.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVML is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
QVML has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
QVML is categorized as Multi-factor, while UGA is Oil & Gas. QVML tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value &Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for QVML and 0.75% for UGA.
QVML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVML and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer