PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVML vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVML vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVML achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.


QVML

1D
-0.58%
1M
5.12%
YTD
11.17%
6M
11.48%
1Y
27.60%
3Y*
22.47%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVML vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
11.17%17.74%25.87%22.19%-16.25%12.56%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between QVML and QQQ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.92

The correlation between QVML and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVML vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVML
QQQ

Technology

35.5%
53.8%

Financial Services

12.8%
0.2%

Communication Services

11.9%
15.8%

Healthcare

8.7%
4.2%

Industrials

8.7%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
7.7%

Energy

3.6%
0.6%

Utilities

2.5%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.1%

Technology

QVML
35.5%
QQQ
53.8%

Financial Services

QVML
12.8%
QQQ
0.2%

Communication Services

QVML
11.9%
QQQ
15.8%

Healthcare

QVML
8.7%
QQQ
4.2%

Industrials

QVML
8.7%
QQQ
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QVML
7.3%
QQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

QVML
5.5%
QQQ
7.7%

Energy

QVML
3.6%
QQQ
0.6%

Utilities

QVML
2.5%
QQQ
1.4%

Basic Materials

QVML
1.9%
QQQ
1.1%

Real Estate

QVML
1.6%
QQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVML vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVML
QVML Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QVML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVML Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVML Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QVML Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVML Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVML vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVMLQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

3.51

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.85

13.49

+1.36

QVML vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVML Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVML and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVMLQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.64

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.41

+0.43

Drawdowns

QVML vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVML drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVML and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVMLQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.52%

-82.97%

+59.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-11.96%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.71%

-22.77%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.26%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-32.79%

+27.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

3.11%

-1.25%

Volatility

QVML vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) is 2.91%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that QVML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVMLQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

4.49%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.96%

12.10%

-3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

15.94%

-4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

22.38%

-5.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

22.29%

-5.70%

QVML vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVML has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QVML vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
0.99%1.10%1.15%1.43%1.72%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, QVML and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to QVML (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVML dropped -23.52% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 3-year performance, QQQ leads with 28.78% vs 22.47% for QVML. On fees, QVML is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, QVML has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 28.78% return vs 22.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVML is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

QVML has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

QVML is categorized as Multi-factor, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. QVML tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value &Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for QVML and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVML and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer