PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVAL vs. QRFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVAL vs. QRFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly higher than QRFT's 12.60% return.


QVAL

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.34%
YTD
14.68%
6M
15.27%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
11.64%

QRFT

1D
-0.34%
1M
6.39%
YTD
12.60%
6M
12.89%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
21.65%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVAL vs. QRFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
14.68%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%34.40%-5.93%10.45%
QRFT
QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF
12.60%17.95%21.36%24.16%-22.69%22.74%40.05%14.90%

Correlation

The correlation between QVAL and QRFT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2019

0.63

The correlation between QVAL and QRFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QVAL vs. QRFT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVAL
QRFT

Consumer Cyclical

32.4%
10.1%

Technology

16.7%
35.4%

Industrials

15.0%
9.7%

Healthcare

11.1%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
6.7%

Basic Materials

7.6%
2.0%

Energy

5.5%
4.2%

Communication Services

3.8%
10.2%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.0%

Financial Services

-

10.7%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QVAL
32.4%
QRFT
10.1%

Technology

QVAL
16.7%
QRFT
35.4%

Industrials

QVAL
15.0%
QRFT
9.7%

Healthcare

QVAL
11.1%
QRFT
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

QVAL
7.9%
QRFT
6.7%

Basic Materials

QVAL
7.6%
QRFT
2.0%

Energy

QVAL
5.5%
QRFT
4.2%

Communication Services

QVAL
3.8%
QRFT
10.2%

Real Estate

QVAL
2.0%
QRFT
1.0%

Financial Services

QVAL

-

QRFT
10.7%

Utilities

QVAL

-

QRFT
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVAL vs. QRFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

QRFT
QRFT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QRFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRFT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
QRFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRFT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVAL vs. QRFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVALQRFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.40

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

3.19

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.98

14.12

-0.14

QVAL vs. QRFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the QRFT Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVAL and QRFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVALQRFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.23

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.72

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.86

-0.37

Drawdowns

QVAL vs. QRFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, which is greater than QRFT's maximum drawdown of -30.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and QRFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVALQRFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.49%

-30.19%

-21.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

-9.12%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-19.99%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-28.20%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.34%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-6.79%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.06%

+0.07%

Volatility

QVAL vs. QRFT - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) at 3.45%. This indicates that QVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVALQRFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.45%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

9.97%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

13.08%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.63%

17.34%

+4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

20.10%

+2.69%

QVAL vs. QRFT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than QRFT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVAL vs. QRFT - Dividend Comparison

QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than QRFT's 0.25% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QRFT
QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF
0.25%0.27%0.52%0.77%0.83%0.05%1.81%4.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.46%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVAL and QRFT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QVAL has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to QRFT (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs QRFT's -30.19%.

On 5-year performance, QRFT leads with 12.39% vs 12.15% for QVAL. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, QRFT has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QRFT has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QRFT.

QVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.25% for QRFT.

QVAL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while QRFT is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.75% for QRFT.

QRFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVAL and QRFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer