QVAL vs. VBR
QVAL (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF) and VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVAL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. QVAL is actively managed, while VBR is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QVAL returned 11.91%/yr vs 11.02%/yr for VBR. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QVAL charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VBR.
Performance
QVAL vs. VBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QVAL having a 14.07% return and VBR slightly lower at 13.42%. Over the past 10 years, QVAL has outperformed VBR with an annualized return of 11.91%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.02% annualized return.
QVAL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 14.07%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 29.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
VBR
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
QVAL vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 14.07% | 10.98% | 12.21% | 28.40% | -11.80% | 34.40% | -5.93% | 24.06% | -17.28% | 25.59% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 13.42% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVAL and VBR is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.87 |
The correlation between QVAL and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
QVAL vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QVAL
VBR
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
QVAL
VBR
Energy
QVAL
VBR
Industrials
QVAL
VBR
Healthcare
QVAL
VBR
Consumer Defensive
QVAL
VBR
Technology
QVAL
VBR
Communication Services
QVAL
VBR
Basic Materials
QVAL
VBR
Utilities
QVAL
VBR
Real Estate
QVAL
VBR
Financial Services
QVAL
-
VBR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVAL vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank
QVAL
VBR
QVAL vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QVAL | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.31 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.86 | 3.14 | +1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | 11.11 | +2.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QVAL vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and VBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVAL | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.49% | -61.98% | +10.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.04% | -8.85% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -24.19% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.17% | -24.19% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.49% | -45.28% | -6.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -1.03% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -8.25% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.50% | -0.35% |
Volatility
QVAL vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) have volatilities of 3.99% and 3.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVAL | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 3.97% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 10.66% | -0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.74% | 15.33% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 19.73% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 21.75% | +1.05% |
QVAL vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVAL vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison
QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than VBR's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 1.16% | 1.44% | 1.72% | 1.76% | 2.00% | 1.23% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 1.30% | 0.00% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.73% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVAL and VBR have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QVAL has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to VBR (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs VBR's -61.98%.
On 10-year performance, QVAL leads with 11.91% vs 11.02% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QVAL has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 11.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QVAL.
VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.16% for QVAL.
QVAL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.05% for VBR.
QVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVAL and VBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer