PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVAL vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVAL vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 16.37% return. Over the past 10 years, QVAL has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 11.94%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.57% annualized return.


QVAL

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.77%
6M
14.38%
YTD
20.72%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
11.94%
ALL TIME*
11.53%

VTV

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.36%
6M
11.27%
YTD
16.37%
1Y
27.94%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
12.57%
ALL TIME*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.37M$1.75M$1.48M
$688.19M$688.42M$619.05M

QVAL vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
20.72%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%34.40%-5.93%24.06%-17.28%25.59%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
16.37%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between QVAL and VTV is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.80

The correlation between QVAL and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVAL vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVAL
VTV

Consumer Cyclical

21.6%
3.9%

Energy

20.3%
6.9%

Healthcare

14.1%
15.2%

Industrials

12.3%
14.3%

Technology

10.0%
15.3%

Basic Materials

8.0%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
8.7%

Communication Services

5.8%
2.9%

Utilities

2.0%
4.8%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.5%

Financial Services

-

22.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QVAL
21.6%
VTV
3.9%

Energy

QVAL
20.3%
VTV
6.9%

Healthcare

QVAL
14.1%
VTV
15.2%

Industrials

QVAL
12.3%
VTV
14.3%

Technology

QVAL
10.0%
VTV
15.3%

Basic Materials

QVAL
8.0%
VTV
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

QVAL
5.9%
VTV
8.7%

Communication Services

QVAL
5.8%
VTV
2.9%

Utilities

QVAL
2.0%
VTV
4.8%

Real Estate

QVAL
2.0%
VTV
2.5%

Financial Services

QVAL

-

VTV
22.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVAL vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QVAL vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QVALVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.18

4.24

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.14

16.42

+2.72

QVAL vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVAL and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QVAL vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVALVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.49%

-59.27%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

-6.35%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-14.52%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-17.04%

-10.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

-36.78%

-14.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-1.36%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

-7.82%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.64%

+0.31%

Volatility

QVAL vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.62%. This indicates that QVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVALVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

2.62%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

7.72%

+2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

10.36%

+3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.56%

13.82%

+7.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.70%

16.61%

+6.09%

QVAL vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVAL vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.42%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%0.00%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVAL and VTV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QVAL has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to VTV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.57% vs 11.94% for QVAL. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.57% return vs 11.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QVAL.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.42% for QVAL.

QVAL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVAL and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer