QRFT vs. OMFL
Compare and contrast key facts about QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL).
QRFT and OMFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QRFT is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on May 21, 2019. OMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QRFT or OMFL.
Key characteristics
| QRFT | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.51% | 6.94% |
| 1Y Return | 29.16% | 18.46% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.74% | 7.17% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.26 | 1.30 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.43% | 13.52% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.19% | -33.24% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between QRFT and OMFL is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QRFT vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, QRFT achieves a 11.51% return, which is significantly higher than OMFL's 6.94% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QRFT vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRFT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QRFT vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QRFT vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison
QRFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than OMFL's 1.35% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.70% | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.05% | 1.81% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1.35% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% |
Drawdowns
QRFT vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRFT drawdown since its inception was -30.19%, smaller than the maximum OMFL drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRFT and OMFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QRFT vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison
QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) at 3.19%. This indicates that QRFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.