PortfoliosLab logo
QRFT vs. OMFL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QRFT and OMFL is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

QRFT vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

80.00%90.00%100.00%110.00%120.00%130.00%140.00%150.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
119.14%
100.11%
QRFT
OMFL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QRFT:

0.46

OMFL:

0.10

Sortino Ratio

QRFT:

0.77

OMFL:

0.28

Omega Ratio

QRFT:

1.12

OMFL:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

QRFT:

0.45

OMFL:

0.12

Martin Ratio

QRFT:

1.76

OMFL:

0.38

Ulcer Index

QRFT:

5.13%

OMFL:

5.03%

Daily Std Dev

QRFT:

19.56%

OMFL:

18.21%

Max Drawdown

QRFT:

-30.19%

OMFL:

-33.24%

Current Drawdown

QRFT:

-11.06%

OMFL:

-7.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRFT achieves a -4.76% return, which is significantly lower than OMFL's -2.09% return.


QRFT

YTD

-4.76%

1M

-2.70%

6M

-4.84%

1Y

8.67%

5Y*

15.01%

10Y*

N/A

OMFL

YTD

-2.09%

1M

-1.52%

6M

-0.09%

1Y

2.15%

5Y*

14.45%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QRFT vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRFT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for QRFT: current value is 0.75%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QRFT: 0.75%
Expense ratio chart for OMFL: current value is 0.29%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
OMFL: 0.29%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QRFT vs. OMFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QRFT is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QRFT is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QRFT is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QRFT is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QRFT is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QRFT is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

OMFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of OMFL is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of OMFL is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of OMFL is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of OMFL is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of OMFL is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of OMFL is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QRFT vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for QRFT, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
QRFT: 0.46
OMFL: 0.10
The chart of Sortino ratio for QRFT, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
QRFT: 0.77
OMFL: 0.28
The chart of Omega ratio for QRFT, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
QRFT: 1.12
OMFL: 1.04
The chart of Calmar ratio for QRFT, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
QRFT: 0.45
OMFL: 0.12
The chart of Martin ratio for QRFT, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
QRFT: 1.76
OMFL: 0.38

The current QRFT Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the OMFL Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRFT and OMFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.46
0.10
QRFT
OMFL

Dividends

QRFT vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison

QRFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than OMFL's 1.01% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
QRFT
QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF
0.56%0.52%0.78%0.83%0.05%1.81%4.00%0.00%0.00%
OMFL
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
1.01%1.22%1.37%1.55%0.95%1.48%1.53%1.39%0.32%

Drawdowns

QRFT vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRFT drawdown since its inception was -30.19%, smaller than the maximum OMFL drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRFT and OMFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-11.06%
-7.58%
QRFT
OMFL

Volatility

QRFT vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison

QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) has a higher volatility of 14.40% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) at 12.11%. This indicates that QRFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.40%
12.11%
QRFT
OMFL