PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QUS vs. MEME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QUS vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QUS is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

QUS vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUS achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 89.03% return.

QUS

1D
-0.43%
1M
2.68%
YTD
6.67%
6M
6.93%
1Y
17.65%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.67%

MEME

1D
4.46%
1M
34.40%
YTD
89.03%
6M
82.84%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUS vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF		6.67%1.91%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF		89.03%-36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between QUS and MEME is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.43

QUS vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
QUS
MEME

Technology

26.3%
58.8%

Financial Services

14.6%
5.7%

Healthcare

13.4%
5.4%

Communication Services

10.2%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%

-

Industrials

8.6%
29.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%

-

Energy

4.6%
4.8%

Utilities

3.6%
10.7%

Basic Materials

2.3%
4.6%

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Technology

QUS
26.3%
MEME
58.8%

Financial Services

QUS
14.6%
MEME
5.7%

Healthcare

QUS
13.4%
MEME
5.4%

Communication Services

QUS
10.2%
MEME
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

QUS
9.2%
MEME

-

Industrials

QUS
8.6%
MEME
29.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QUS
5.8%
MEME

-

Energy

QUS
4.6%
MEME
4.8%

Utilities

QUS
3.6%
MEME
10.7%

Basic Materials

QUS
2.3%
MEME
4.6%

Real Estate

QUS
1.4%
MEME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF

Roundhill Meme Stock ETF

Often compared with QUS:
QUS vs. IVVQUS vs. QUALQUS vs. SPYQUS vs. JQUAQUS vs. VOOQUS vs. DGTQUS vs. BERZ
Often compared with MEME:
MEME vs. AFLGMEME vs. ANEWMEME vs. IWFMEME vs. URAMEME vs. BCHPMEME vs. QQQMMEME vs. TMFC

Return for Risk

QUS vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
MEME
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUS vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

QUSMEMEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.95

—

—

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.81

—

—

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

—

—

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

—

—

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.54

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QUS vs. MEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

QUSMEMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.43

+0.34

Drawdowns

QUS vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUS drawdown since its inception was -33.78%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUS and MEME.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QUSMEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.78%

-48.78%

+15.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.94%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.30%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.68%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-30.05%

+26.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

—

—

Volatility

QUS vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QUSMEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.09%

74.11%

-65.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.33%

74.11%

-59.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.42%

74.11%

-57.69%

QUS vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

QUS vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF		1.31%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

QUS and MEME have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUS and 0.69% for MEME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUS and MEME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer