QURE vs. LAC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about uniQure N.V. (QURE) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC).

Performance

QURE vs. LAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in uniQure N.V. (QURE) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QURE vs. LAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QURE uniQure N.V.	-29.42%	35.50%	160.86%	9.55%
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	-9.40%	46.80%	-53.59%	-36.82%

Fundamentals

Market Cap QURE : $971.21M LAC : $962.45M
EPS QURE : -$3.49 LAC : $0.00
PB Ratio QURE : 4.88 LAC : 0.91
Total Revenue (TTM) QURE : $16.10M LAC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) QURE : $14.41M LAC : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) QURE : -$144.25M LAC : $0.00

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QURE achieves a -29.42% return, which is significantly lower than LAC's -9.40% return.

QURE

• 1D: 3.30%
• 1M: 60.86%
• YTD: -29.42%
• 6M: -69.29%
• 1Y: 70.43%
• 3Y*: -5.70%
• 5Y*: -13.11%
• 10Y*: 2.85%

LAC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -22.85%
• YTD: -9.40%
• 6M: -43.89%
• 1Y: 43.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

QURE vs. LAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QURE

QURE Risk / Return Rank: 69
QURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
QURE Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
QURE Martin Ratio Rank: 54

LAC

LAC Risk / Return Rank: 62
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 70
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QURE vs. LAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for uniQure N.V. (QURE) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QURE	LAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	0.33	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	1.86	+1.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.22	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	0.73	-0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.32	1.30	+0.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QURE vs. LAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QURE Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is comparable to the LAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QURE and LAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QURE	LAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26	0.33	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	-0.31	+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between QURE and LAC is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QURE vs. LAC - Dividend Comparison

Neither QURE nor LAC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QURE vs. LAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QURE drawdown since its inception was -95.40%, which is greater than LAC's maximum drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QURE and LAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	QURE	LAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.40%	-81.83%	-13.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-87.21%	-63.08%	-24.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.45%	-66.30%	-13.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.34%	-63.64%	+7.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.96%	35.08%	+9.88%

Volatility

QURE vs. LAC - Volatility Comparison

uniQure N.V. (QURE) has a higher volatility of 44.88% compared to Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) at 16.21%. This indicates that QURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QURE	LAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	44.88%	16.21%	+28.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	113.48%	69.33%	+44.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	276.62%	130.24%	+146.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	153.21%	102.58%	+50.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	119.51%	102.58%	+16.93%

Financials