QUAL vs. SPYG
QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUAL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QUAL returned 14.46%/yr vs 17.91%/yr for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QUAL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
QUAL vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QUAL having a 9.44% return and SPYG slightly higher at 9.70%. Over the past 10 years, QUAL has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 14.46%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.91% annualized return.
QUAL
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- 1Y
- 22.87%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.97%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
SPYG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.17%
- 3Y*
- 25.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- 17.91%
QUAL vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 9.44% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 30.88% | -20.50% | 26.94% | 17.04% | 33.89% | -5.70% | 22.26% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 9.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUAL and SPYG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2013 | 0.92 |
The correlation between QUAL and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QUAL vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QUAL
SPYG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QUAL
SPYG
Financial Services
QUAL
SPYG
Communication Services
QUAL
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
QUAL
SPYG
Healthcare
QUAL
SPYG
Industrials
QUAL
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
QUAL
SPYG
Energy
QUAL
SPYG
Utilities
QUAL
SPYG
Real Estate
QUAL
SPYG
Basic Materials
QUAL
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUAL vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
QUAL
SPYG
QUAL vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUAL | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 2.01 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | 8.08 | +2.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUAL vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUAL | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.06% | -67.63% | +33.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -13.76% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.00% | -22.14% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | -32.67% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -32.67% | -1.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -4.65% | +4.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -24.30% | +20.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 3.42% | -1.43% |
Volatility
QUAL vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) is 3.63%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that QUAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUAL | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 6.33% | -2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.43% | 13.48% | -4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 16.81% | -4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 21.27% | -3.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 20.70% | -2.59% |
QUAL vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QUAL vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than SPYG's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.87% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUAL and SPYG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to QUAL (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.91% vs 14.46% for QUAL. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.91% return vs 14.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUAL.
QUAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.
QUAL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.04% for SPYG.
QUAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUAL and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer