PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUAL vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUAL vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QUAL having a 9.44% return and SPYG slightly higher at 9.70%. Over the past 10 years, QUAL has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 14.46%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.91% annualized return.


QUAL

1D
0.47%
1M
2.14%
YTD
9.44%
6M
9.29%
1Y
22.87%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
11.97%
10Y*
14.46%

SPYG

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
17.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUAL vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
9.44%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%26.94%17.04%33.89%-5.70%22.26%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between QUAL and SPYG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2013

0.92

The correlation between QUAL and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QUAL vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QUAL
SPYG

Technology

36.5%
52.2%

Financial Services

11.5%
8.3%

Communication Services

11.1%
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
8.9%

Healthcare

9.0%
5.8%

Industrials

8.2%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
1.0%

Energy

4.0%
0.1%

Utilities

1.9%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.5%

Basic Materials

1.7%
0.3%

Technology

QUAL
36.5%
SPYG
52.2%

Financial Services

QUAL
11.5%
SPYG
8.3%

Communication Services

QUAL
11.1%
SPYG
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

QUAL
9.3%
SPYG
8.9%

Healthcare

QUAL
9.0%
SPYG
5.8%

Industrials

QUAL
8.2%
SPYG
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

QUAL
4.9%
SPYG
1.0%

Energy

QUAL
4.0%
SPYG
0.1%

Utilities

QUAL
1.9%
SPYG
1.1%

Real Estate

QUAL
1.8%
SPYG
0.5%

Basic Materials

QUAL
1.7%
SPYG
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUAL vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUAL vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QUALSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.01

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

8.08

+2.52

QUAL vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUAL and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUAL vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUALSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.06%

-67.63%

+33.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-13.76%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.00%

-22.14%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

-32.67%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

-32.67%

-1.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-4.65%

+4.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-24.30%

+20.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

3.42%

-1.43%

Volatility

QUAL vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) is 3.63%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that QUAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUALSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

6.33%

-2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

13.48%

-4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

16.81%

-4.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

21.27%

-3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

20.70%

-2.59%

QUAL vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QUAL vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than SPYG's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
0.87%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.48%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


QUAL and SPYG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to QUAL (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.91% vs 14.46% for QUAL. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.91% return vs 14.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUAL.

QUAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.

QUAL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.04% for SPYG.

QUAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUAL and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer