QUAL vs. MTUM
QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUAL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QUAL returned 14.62%/yr vs 18.03%/yr for MTUM. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
QUAL vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 38.19% return. Over the past 10 years, QUAL has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 14.62%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.03% annualized return.
QUAL
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 24.05%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 14.62%
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 13.83%
- YTD
- 38.19%
- 6M
- 36.52%
- 1Y
- 50.96%
- 3Y*
- 35.93%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- 18.03%
QUAL vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 9.09% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 30.88% | -20.50% | 26.94% | 17.04% | 33.89% | -5.70% | 22.26% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 38.19% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUAL and MTUM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2013 | 0.84 |
The correlation between QUAL and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
QUAL vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QUAL
MTUM
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
QUAL
MTUM
Communication Services
QUAL
MTUM
Financial Services
QUAL
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
QUAL
MTUM
Healthcare
QUAL
MTUM
Industrials
QUAL
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
QUAL
MTUM
Energy
QUAL
MTUM
Utilities
QUAL
MTUM
Basic Materials
QUAL
MTUM
Real Estate
QUAL
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUAL vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
QUAL
MTUM
QUAL vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUAL | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 4.44 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.20 | 17.05 | -4.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUAL vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUAL | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.06% | -34.08% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -11.54% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.00% | -20.99% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | -32.28% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -34.08% | +0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | 0.00% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -6.19% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 3.00% | -1.02% |
Volatility
QUAL vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) is 3.85%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that QUAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUAL | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 11.02% | -7.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.56% | 18.88% | -9.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 21.48% | -9.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 21.06% | -3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 21.28% | -3.15% |
QUAL vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QUAL and MTUM have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QUAL vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than MTUM's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.54% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.87% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUAL and MTUM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (11.02%) compared to QUAL (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 18.03% vs 14.62% for QUAL. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 18.03% return vs 14.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUAL and MTUM have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
QUAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.54% for MTUM.
QUAL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index.
MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUAL and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer