PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QUAL vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QUAL vs. IVV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUAL is a Quality Factor fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QUAL returned 14.15%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for IVV. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. QUAL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.

Performance

QUAL vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, QUAL has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 14.15%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.11% annualized return.

QUAL

1D
0.18%
1M
0.41%
6M
8.77%
YTD
10.86%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
14.15%
ALL TIME*
13.66%

IVV

1D
0.69%
1M
0.25%
6M
8.53%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
21.55%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
15.11%
ALL TIME*
8.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

IVV

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
$3.36B$3.31B$5.91B

QUAL

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
$216.39M$244.32M$382.94M

QUAL vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF		10.86%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%26.94%17.04%33.89%-5.70%22.26%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF		10.13%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between QUAL and IVV is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2013

0.96

The correlation between QUAL and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

QUAL vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
QUAL
IVV

Technology

40.2%
37.2%

Financial Services

10.9%
12.5%

Communication Services

10.3%
9.6%

Healthcare

9.2%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
8.9%

Industrials

7.4%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.8%

Energy

2.9%
3.3%

Utilities

2.1%
2.6%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.9%

Technology

QUAL
40.2%
IVV
37.2%

Financial Services

QUAL
10.9%
IVV
12.5%

Communication Services

QUAL
10.3%
IVV
9.6%

Healthcare

QUAL
9.2%
IVV
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QUAL
9.0%
IVV
8.9%

Industrials

QUAL
7.4%
IVV
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

QUAL
4.3%
IVV
4.8%

Energy

QUAL
2.9%
IVV
3.3%

Utilities

QUAL
2.1%
IVV
2.6%

Basic Materials

QUAL
1.9%
IVV
1.8%

Real Estate

QUAL
1.7%
IVV
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

Often compared with QUAL:
QUAL vs. SPHQQUAL vs. SPYQUAL vs. MTUMQUAL vs. USMVQUAL vs. VOOQUAL vs. SCHDQUAL vs. GARP
Often compared with IVV:
IVV vs. VOOIVV vs. SPYIVV vs. FXAIXIVV vs. QQQIVV vs. VTIIVV vs. IOOIVV vs. CSPX.L

Return for Risk

QUAL vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QUAL vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QUALIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.65
1.53

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.36
2.12

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.21

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.08

9.43

+0.65

QUAL vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUAL and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUAL vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and IVV.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QUALIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.06%

-55.25%

+21.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-8.89%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.00%

-18.75%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

-24.53%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

-33.90%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-1.41%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-10.72%

+6.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.09%

-0.08%

Volatility

QUAL vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) is 2.88%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that QUAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QUALIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

3.52%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

10.18%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

12.89%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

17.01%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

18.06%

+0.03%

QUAL vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QUAL vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than IVV's 1.09% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF		1.09%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF		0.86%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.93, QUAL and IVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVV has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to QUAL (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.11% vs 14.15% for QUAL. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 14.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUAL.

IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.86% for QUAL.

QUAL is categorized as Quality Factor, while IVV is S&P 500. QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.03% for IVV.

QUAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUAL and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer