QUAL vs. IVV
QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUAL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QUAL returned 14.62%/yr vs 15.75%/yr for IVV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QUAL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
QUAL vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 9.76% return. Over the past 10 years, QUAL has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 14.62%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.75% annualized return.
QUAL
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 24.05%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 14.62%
IVV
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.76%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.75%
QUAL vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 9.09% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 30.88% | -20.50% | 26.94% | 17.04% | 33.89% | -5.70% | 22.26% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 9.76% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUAL and IVV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2013 | 0.96 |
The correlation between QUAL and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
QUAL vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QUAL
IVV
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
QUAL
IVV
Communication Services
QUAL
IVV
Financial Services
QUAL
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
QUAL
IVV
Healthcare
QUAL
IVV
Industrials
QUAL
IVV
Consumer Defensive
QUAL
IVV
Energy
QUAL
IVV
Utilities
QUAL
IVV
Basic Materials
QUAL
IVV
Real Estate
QUAL
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUAL vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
QUAL
IVV
QUAL vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUAL | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 3.03 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.20 | 13.61 | -1.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUAL vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUAL | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.06% | -55.25% | +21.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -8.89% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.00% | -18.75% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | -24.53% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -33.90% | -0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -1.74% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -10.76% | +6.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 1.98% | 0.00% |
Volatility
QUAL vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) is 3.85%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that QUAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUAL | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 4.67% | -0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.56% | 9.75% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 12.41% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 16.97% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 18.10% | +0.03% |
QUAL vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QUAL vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than IVV's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.87% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, QUAL and IVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IVV has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to QUAL (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.75% vs 14.62% for QUAL. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.75% return vs 14.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUAL.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.87% for QUAL.
QUAL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUAL and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer