QUAL vs. QDEF
QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) and QDEF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund) are both Quality Factor funds - QUAL tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index while QDEF tracks the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QUAL returned 14.16%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for QDEF. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QUAL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for QDEF.
Performance
QUAL vs. QDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly higher than QDEF's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, QUAL has outperformed QDEF with an annualized return of 14.16%, while QDEF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.03% annualized return.
QUAL
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 12.08%
- 1Y
- 22.77%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.26%
- 10Y*
- 14.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.75%
QDEF
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 21.44%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.40%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $574.46K | $566.98K | $752.75K | |
| $217.13M | $238.90M | $384.89M |
QUAL vs. QDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 12.08% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 30.88% | -20.50% | 26.94% | 17.04% | 33.89% | -5.70% | 22.26% |
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 10.91% | 17.43% | 21.19% | 17.48% | -10.94% | 26.04% | 3.15% | 24.90% | -4.10% | 17.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUAL and QDEF is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2013 | 0.90 |
The correlation between QUAL and QDEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
QUAL vs. QDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QUAL
QDEF
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
QUAL
QDEF
Financial Services
QUAL
QDEF
Communication Services
QUAL
QDEF
Healthcare
QUAL
QDEF
Consumer Cyclical
QUAL
QDEF
Industrials
QUAL
QDEF
Consumer Defensive
QUAL
QDEF
Energy
QUAL
QDEF
Utilities
QUAL
QDEF
Basic Materials
QUAL
QDEF
Real Estate
QUAL
QDEF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUAL vs. QDEF — Risk / Return Rank
QUAL
QDEF
QUAL vs. QDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUAL | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.41 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 3.10 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.33 | 12.91 | -1.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUAL vs. QDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, roughly equal to the maximum QDEF drawdown of -35.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and QDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUAL | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.06% | -35.74% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -6.95% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.00% | -14.43% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | -21.37% | -6.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -35.74% | +1.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.19% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -3.27% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 1.66% | +0.35% |
Volatility
QUAL vs. QDEF - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) at 2.23%. This indicates that QUAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUAL | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 2.23% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 7.47% | +2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 9.84% | +2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 13.77% | +3.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 16.14% | +1.96% |
QUAL vs. QDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QDEF's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
QUAL vs. QDEF - Dividend Comparison
QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than QDEF's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 1.57% | 1.74% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 2.42% | 1.84% | 2.50% | 3.17% | 7.10% | 2.70% | 2.90% | 3.00% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.85% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUAL and QDEF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUAL has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to QDEF (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs QDEF's -35.74%.
On 10-year performance, QUAL leads with 14.16% vs 12.03% for QDEF. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 14.16% return vs 12.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.
QDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.85% for QUAL.
QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while QDEF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.37% for QDEF.
QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUAL and QDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer