PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QUAL vs. IWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QUAL vs. IWN

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) and IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUAL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while IWN is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QUAL returned 14.46%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for IWN. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QUAL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWN.

Performance

QUAL vs. IWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than IWN's 20.82% return. Over the past 10 years, QUAL has outperformed IWN with an annualized return of 14.46%, while IWN has yielded a comparatively lower 10.58% annualized return.

QUAL

1D
0.47%
1M
3.07%
YTD
9.44%
6M
9.29%
1Y
22.87%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
11.97%
10Y*
14.46%

IWN

1D
1.17%
1M
6.00%
YTD
20.82%
6M
17.48%
1Y
44.79%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
10.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUAL vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF		9.44%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%26.94%17.04%33.89%-5.70%22.26%
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF		20.82%12.40%7.63%14.56%-14.77%27.96%4.66%22.01%-13.01%7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between QUAL and IWN is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2013

0.74

The correlation between QUAL and IWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

QUAL vs. IWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
QUAL
IWN

Technology

38.8%
11.6%

Communication Services

11.8%
2.7%

Financial Services

10.8%
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
8.9%

Healthcare

8.7%
10.1%

Industrials

7.2%
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
2.1%

Energy

3.2%
7.9%

Utilities

2.1%
5.1%

Basic Materials

1.9%
5.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
10.2%

Technology

QUAL
38.8%
IWN
11.6%

Communication Services

QUAL
11.8%
IWN
2.7%

Financial Services

QUAL
10.8%
IWN
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QUAL
9.3%
IWN
8.9%

Healthcare

QUAL
8.7%
IWN
10.1%

Industrials

QUAL
7.2%
IWN
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

QUAL
4.4%
IWN
2.1%

Energy

QUAL
3.2%
IWN
7.9%

Utilities

QUAL
2.1%
IWN
5.1%

Basic Materials

QUAL
1.9%
IWN
5.4%

Real Estate

QUAL
1.8%
IWN
10.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF

Often compared with QUAL:
QUAL vs. SPHQQUAL vs. SPYQUAL vs. MTUMQUAL vs. USMVQUAL vs. VOOQUAL vs. IVVQUAL vs. SCHD
Often compared with IWN:
IWN vs. IWMIWN vs. IWOIWN vs. VTWOIWN vs. IJSIWN vs. IWSIWN vs. IWVIWN vs. IWX

Return for Risk

QUAL vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
IWN
IWN Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUAL vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QUALIWNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.74
2.35

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.46
3.27

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

5.02

-2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

16.91

-6.31

QUAL vs. IWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the IWN Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUAL and IWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUAL vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, smaller than the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and IWN.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QUALIWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.06%

-61.55%

+27.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-8.45%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.00%

-26.70%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

-26.70%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

-46.08%

+12.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

0.00%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-10.15%

+6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.51%

-0.52%

Volatility

QUAL vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) is 3.63%, while iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that QUAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QUALIWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

5.80%

-2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

12.25%

-2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

18.09%

-5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

21.47%

-4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

23.41%

-5.30%

QUAL vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QUAL vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison

QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than IWN's 1.42% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF		1.42%1.70%1.80%2.04%2.12%1.48%1.60%1.92%1.99%1.78%1.74%2.15%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF		0.87%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

QUAL and IWN have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWN has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to QUAL (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs IWN's -61.55%.

On 10-year performance, QUAL leads with 14.46% vs 10.58% for IWN. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 14.46% return vs 10.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWN.

IWN has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.87% for QUAL.

QUAL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IWN is Small Cap Value Equities. QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.24% for IWN.

IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUAL and IWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer