QUAL vs. IGF
QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUAL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QUAL returned 14.37%/yr vs 8.40%/yr for IGF. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QUAL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.
Performance
QUAL vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 9.67% return. Over the past 10 years, QUAL has outperformed IGF with an annualized return of 14.37%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.40% annualized return.
QUAL
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- 1Y
- 24.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 14.37%
IGF
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 9.67%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 18.46%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
QUAL vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 9.12% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 30.88% | -20.50% | 26.94% | 17.04% | 33.89% | -5.70% | 22.26% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.67% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 11.57% | -6.50% | 25.82% | -9.95% | 19.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUAL and IGF is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2013 | 0.65 |
The correlation between QUAL and IGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QUAL vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QUAL
IGF
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Technology
QUAL
IGF
-
Communication Services
QUAL
IGF
-
Financial Services
QUAL
IGF
-
Consumer Cyclical
QUAL
IGF
-
Healthcare
QUAL
IGF
-
Industrials
QUAL
IGF
Consumer Defensive
QUAL
IGF
-
Energy
QUAL
IGF
Utilities
QUAL
IGF
Basic Materials
QUAL
IGF
-
Real Estate
QUAL
IGF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUAL vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank
QUAL
IGF
QUAL vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUAL | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.31 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 3.10 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.89 | 8.83 | +3.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUAL vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and IGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUAL | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.06% | -58.33% | +24.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -5.87% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.00% | -14.28% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | -20.83% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -42.11% | +8.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -2.99% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -11.85% | +7.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.06% | -0.09% |
Volatility
QUAL vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.45%. This indicates that QUAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUAL | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 3.45% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | 8.73% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 10.57% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 13.97% | +3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 16.83% | +1.29% |
QUAL vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
QUAL vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than IGF's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.91% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.87% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUAL and IGF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUAL has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to IGF (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs IGF's -58.33%.
On 10-year performance, QUAL leads with 14.37% vs 8.40% for IGF. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 14.37% return vs 8.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.
IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 0.87% for QUAL.
QUAL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.39% for IGF.
QUAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUAL and IGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer