QTUM vs. GLTR
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTUM returned 28.09%/yr vs 14.04%/yr for GLTR. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GLTR.
Performance
QTUM vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 47.39% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's -4.66% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 47.39%
- 6M
- 45.72%
- 1Y
- 82.93%
- 3Y*
- 48.15%
- 5Y*
- 28.09%
- 10Y*
- —
GLTR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -15.53%
- YTD
- -4.66%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 39.78%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
QTUM vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 47.39% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.44% |
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | -4.66% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | 9.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and GLTR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
GLTR
QTUM vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTUM | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.22 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.46 | 1.17 | +4.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.77 | 2.88 | +16.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and GLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -55.70% | +17.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -34.09% | +18.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | -34.09% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -34.09% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.42% | -31.27% | +26.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -28.82% | +20.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 13.86% | -9.65% |
Volatility
QTUM vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 14.18% compared to abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) at 10.43%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.18% | 10.43% | +3.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.17% | 36.24% | -13.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.39% | 38.40% | -10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.99% | 23.87% | +3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 20.64% | +6.76% |
QTUM vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTUM vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.73% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and GLTR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to GLTR (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs GLTR's -55.70%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 28.09% vs 14.04% for GLTR. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GLTR has been the lower-risk option at 10.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 28.09% return vs 14.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GLTR.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.
QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while GLTR is Precious Metals. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.60% for GLTR.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and GLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer