QTR vs. MNA
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA).
QTR and MNA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QTR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. MNA is a passively managed fund by New York Life that tracks the performance of the IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. It was launched on Nov 17, 2009. Both QTR and MNA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QTR vs. MNA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QTR vs. MNA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | -6.22% | 14.52% | 21.46% | 45.53% | -29.94% | 4.16% |
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF | 0.89% | 8.59% | 4.93% | 0.18% | -1.61% | -2.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTR achieves a -6.22% return, which is significantly lower than MNA's 0.89% return.
QTR
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- -6.22%
- 6M
- -5.45%
- 1Y
- 17.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNA
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.93%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QTR vs. MNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MNA's 0.77% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QTR vs. MNA — Risk / Return Rank
QTR
MNA
QTR vs. MNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTR | MNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.02 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 1.56 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 2.39 | -0.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.22 | 9.41 | -4.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTR | MNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.02 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.36 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between QTR and MNA is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QTR vs. MNA - Dividend Comparison
QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.02%, while MNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 20.02% | 18.77% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.87% |
Drawdowns
QTR vs. MNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, which is greater than MNA's maximum drawdown of -16.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and MNA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTR | MNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -16.68% | -15.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -2.21% | -10.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.70% | -1.12% | -8.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.10% | -2.86% | -6.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 0.56% | +2.94% |
Volatility
QTR vs. MNA - Volatility Comparison
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) at 1.81%. This indicates that QTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QTR | MNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 1.81% | +3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | 3.06% | +7.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.47% | 5.04% | +11.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 4.98% | +13.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 6.55% | +11.61% |