MNA vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
MNA and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MNA is a passively managed fund by New York Life that tracks the performance of the IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. It was launched on Nov 17, 2009. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both MNA and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MNA or QQQ.
Key characteristics
| MNA | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.20% | 16.64% |
| 1Y Return | 5.42% | 26.87% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.28% | 8.55% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.23% | 21.34% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.17% | 17.88% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.87 | 1.59 |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.07% | 17.19% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.68% | -82.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.97% | -5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNA and QQQ is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MNA vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MNA achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MNA has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 2.17%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.88% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNA vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNA has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MNA vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MNA vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
MNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than QQQ's 0.61% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF | 1.15% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.99% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.61% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
MNA vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNA drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNA and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MNA vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) is 0.86%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that MNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.