QTR vs. XYLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG).
QTR and XYLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QTR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. XYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Sep 18, 2020. Both QTR and XYLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QTR or XYLG.
Correlation
The correlation between QTR and XYLG is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QTR vs. XYLG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QTR:
0.38
XYLG:
0.52
QTR:
0.64
XYLG:
0.86
QTR:
1.08
XYLG:
1.14
QTR:
0.36
XYLG:
0.53
QTR:
1.01
XYLG:
2.19
QTR:
6.83%
XYLG:
4.25%
QTR:
18.61%
XYLG:
17.46%
QTR:
-31.72%
XYLG:
-21.30%
QTR:
-11.08%
XYLG:
-7.84%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTR achieves a -6.46% return, which is significantly lower than XYLG's -4.21% return.
QTR
-6.46%
9.76%
-6.80%
7.02%
N/A
N/A
XYLG
-4.21%
11.61%
-3.34%
8.99%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QTR vs. XYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QTR and XYLG have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QTR vs. XYLG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
QTR
XYLG
QTR vs. XYLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QTR vs. XYLG - Dividend Comparison
QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than XYLG's 25.68% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 1.90% | 0.00% |
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 25.68% | 23.65% | 4.90% | 6.44% | 7.40% | 1.39% |
Drawdowns
QTR vs. XYLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, which is greater than XYLG's maximum drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and XYLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QTR vs. XYLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is 7.94%, while Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) has a volatility of 10.95%. This indicates that QTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.