MNA vs. BUFF
MNA (IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF) and BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNA is a Event Driven fund tracking the IQ Merger Arbitrage Index, while BUFF is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MNA returned 2.06%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for BUFF. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MNA charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BUFF.
Performance
MNA vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNA achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than BUFF's 5.17% return.
MNA
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 2.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.57%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.67%
BUFF
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 10.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.57M | $5.21M | $4.30M | |
| $554.22K | $1.54M | $1.03M |
MNA vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF | 1.60% | 8.59% | 4.93% | 0.18% | -1.61% | -3.24% | 2.72% | 4.70% | 2.13% | 5.97% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 5.17% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | -12.08% | 32.32% | -7.04% | 15.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNA and BUFF is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2016 | 0.32 |
The correlation between MNA and BUFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNA vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank
MNA
BUFF
MNA vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNA | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.38 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 2.84 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.99 | 14.49 | -10.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNA vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNA drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNA and BUFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNA | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.68% | -46.23% | +29.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.40% | -3.58% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.01% | -10.24% | +7.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.54% | -10.24% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -1.17% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -6.09% | +3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 0.70% | -0.12% |
Volatility
MNA vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison
IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) has a higher volatility of 1.53% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.26%. This indicates that MNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNA | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.53% | 1.26% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.65% | 4.16% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.82% | 5.26% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 8.45% | -3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.52% | 17.55% | -11.03% |
MNA vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNA has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNA vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison
Neither MNA nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% | 0.00% |
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNA and BUFF have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MNA has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to BUFF (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNA dropped -16.68% vs BUFF's -46.23%.
On 5-year performance, BUFF leads with 8.43% vs 2.06% for MNA. On fees, MNA is cheaper at 0.77% per year. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BUFF has performed better with a 8.43% return vs 2.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MNA is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.
MNA and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
MNA is categorized as Event Driven, while BUFF is Defined Outcome. MNA tracks IQ Merger Arbitrage Index, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for MNA and 0.89% for BUFF.
BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNA and BUFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer