PortfoliosLab logo
QTR vs. DBMF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QTR and DBMF is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

QTR vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QTR:

0.56

DBMF:

-1.00

Sortino Ratio

QTR:

0.93

DBMF:

-1.21

Omega Ratio

QTR:

1.12

DBMF:

0.85

Calmar Ratio

QTR:

0.58

DBMF:

-0.58

Martin Ratio

QTR:

1.60

DBMF:

-0.99

Ulcer Index

QTR:

6.88%

DBMF:

9.65%

Daily Std Dev

QTR:

19.00%

DBMF:

10.04%

Max Drawdown

QTR:

-31.72%

DBMF:

-20.39%

Current Drawdown

QTR:

-7.77%

DBMF:

-14.64%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QTR having a -2.97% return and DBMF slightly lower at -3.07%.


QTR

YTD

-2.97%

1M

7.98%

6M

-3.30%

1Y

10.54%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

DBMF

YTD

-3.07%

1M

0.52%

6M

-3.56%

1Y

-9.97%

5Y*

5.08%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QTR vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QTR vs. DBMF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QTR is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QTR is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QTR is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QTR is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QTR is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QTR is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DBMF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DBMF is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DBMF is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DBMF is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DBMF is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DBMF is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DBMF is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QTR vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTR and DBMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

QTR vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than DBMF's 6.06% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
0.51%0.50%0.53%0.36%1.90%0.00%0.00%
DBMF
iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
6.06%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%

Drawdowns

QTR vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and DBMF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

QTR vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.07%. This indicates that QTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...