PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QTR vs. DBMF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QTR and DBMF is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.0

Performance

QTR vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
8.73%
-8.87%
QTR
DBMF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QTR:

1.61

DBMF:

0.65

Sortino Ratio

QTR:

2.21

DBMF:

0.92

Omega Ratio

QTR:

1.29

DBMF:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

QTR:

2.32

DBMF:

0.39

Martin Ratio

QTR:

7.08

DBMF:

1.12

Ulcer Index

QTR:

3.65%

DBMF:

6.25%

Daily Std Dev

QTR:

16.07%

DBMF:

10.82%

Max Drawdown

QTR:

-31.72%

DBMF:

-20.39%

Current Drawdown

QTR:

-1.72%

DBMF:

-11.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTR achieves a 25.58% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 7.35% return.


QTR

YTD

25.58%

1M

4.55%

6M

8.80%

1Y

25.82%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

DBMF

YTD

7.35%

1M

-0.81%

6M

-8.36%

1Y

6.98%

5Y*

6.01%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QTR vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.


DBMF
iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Expense ratio chart for DBMF: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for QTR: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QTR vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QTR, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.610.65
The chart of Sortino ratio for QTR, currently valued at 2.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.210.92
The chart of Omega ratio for QTR, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.291.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for QTR, currently valued at 2.32, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.320.39
The chart of Martin ratio for QTR, currently valued at 7.08, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.007.081.12
QTR
DBMF

The current QTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTR and DBMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.61
0.65
QTR
DBMF

Dividends

QTR vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than DBMF's 5.22% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
0.52%0.53%0.37%1.90%0.00%0.00%
DBMF
iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
5.22%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%

Drawdowns

QTR vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and DBMF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-1.72%
-11.85%
QTR
DBMF

Volatility

QTR vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.13%. This indicates that QTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.35%
2.13%
QTR
DBMF
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab