QTR vs. SPY
QTR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTR returned 23.03%/yr vs 22.64%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
QTR vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTR achieves a 17.92% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 11.69% return.
QTR
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 10.53%
- YTD
- 17.92%
- 6M
- 16.22%
- 1Y
- 35.27%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 29.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
QTR vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 17.92% | 14.52% | 21.46% | 45.53% | -29.94% | 4.16% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11.69% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 7.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTR and SPY is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between QTR and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
QTR vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTR
SPY
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QTR
SPY
Communication Services
QTR
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
QTR
SPY
Consumer Defensive
QTR
SPY
Healthcare
QTR
SPY
Industrials
QTR
SPY
Utilities
QTR
SPY
Basic Materials
QTR
SPY
Energy
QTR
SPY
Financial Services
QTR
SPY
Real Estate
QTR
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTR vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
QTR
SPY
QTR vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.51 | 2.52 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.34 | 3.42 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.46 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.42 | -0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | 15.93 | -5.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 2.52 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.59 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
QTR vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -55.19% | +23.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -8.88% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.99% | -18.76% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -9.05% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 1.91% | +1.66% |
Volatility
QTR vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.75%. This indicates that QTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 2.75% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 8.89% | +1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.15% | 11.81% | +2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 17.05% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 17.94% | +0.17% |
QTR vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTR vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.92%, more than SPY's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 15.92% | 18.77% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, QTR and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QTR has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to SPY (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTR dropped -31.72% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 3-year performance, QTR leads with 23.03% vs 22.64% for SPY. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QTR has performed better with a 23.03% return vs 22.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTR.
QTR has the higher dividend yield at 15.92%, compared with 0.97% for SPY.
QTR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPY is S&P 500. QTR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QTR and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTR and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer