PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNA vs. QAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MNA vs. QAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MNA vs. QAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNA
IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF
1.56%8.59%4.93%0.18%-1.61%-3.24%2.72%4.70%2.13%5.97%
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
1.82%8.29%6.67%10.07%-8.68%-0.16%5.73%8.68%-3.32%6.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNA achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than QAI's 1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, MNA has underperformed QAI with an annualized return of 2.73%, while QAI has yielded a comparatively higher 3.30% annualized return.


MNA

1D
0.44%
1M
0.17%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.25%
1Y
5.98%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*
2.73%

QAI

1D
1.25%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.98%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
3.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MNA vs. QAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNA has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than QAI's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MNA vs. QAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNA
MNA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

QAI
QAI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNA vs. QAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNAQAIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

1.41

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

1.99

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

1.93

+0.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.69

8.93

+1.76

MNA vs. QAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the QAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNA and QAI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNAQAIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.41

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.53

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.54

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.51

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between MNA and QAI is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MNA vs. QAI - Dividend Comparison

MNA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNA
IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.20%0.00%0.00%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.21%0.87%
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
1.48%1.50%2.22%4.08%2.00%0.28%1.98%1.91%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.48%

Drawdowns

MNA vs. QAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNA drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, which is greater than QAI's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNA and QAI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MNAQAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.68%

-14.95%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-5.43%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.74%

-14.32%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.68%

-14.95%

-1.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-2.51%

+2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-2.60%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

1.17%

-0.61%

Volatility

MNA vs. QAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) is 1.70%, while IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that MNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MNAQAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

2.83%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

4.95%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.00%

7.55%

-2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.97%

6.51%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.55%

6.12%

+0.43%