MNA vs. DBMF

In the year-to-date period, MNA achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's -2.72% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

MNA has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MNA Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNA and DBMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MNA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%.

The maximum MNA drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum DBMF drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNA and DBMF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) is 1.27%, while iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) has a volatility of 1.98%. This indicates that MNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.