PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSML vs. CAFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QSML vs. CAFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QSML vs. CAFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSML achieves a -3.09% return, which is significantly lower than CAFG's 7.31% return.


QSML

1D
2.75%
1M
-5.17%
YTD
-3.09%
6M
-0.81%
1Y
15.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAFG

1D
2.95%
1M
-2.69%
YTD
7.31%
6M
5.20%
1Y
13.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QSML vs. CAFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSML has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than CAFG's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QSML vs. CAFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSML
QSML Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
QSML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSML Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSML Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
QSML Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSML Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

CAFG
CAFG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CAFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAFG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CAFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAFG Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSML vs. CAFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSMLCAFGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

0.62

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

1.02

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.13

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

1.27

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.82

4.89

-1.06

QSML vs. CAFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSML Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the CAFG Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSML and CAFG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSMLCAFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.62

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.60

-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between QSML and CAFG is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QSML vs. CAFG - Dividend Comparison

QSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than CAFG's 0.32% yield.


TTM202520242023
QSML
Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund
0.64%0.62%0.32%0.00%
CAFG
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.32%0.35%0.36%0.39%

Drawdowns

QSML vs. CAFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSML drawdown since its inception was -28.54%, which is greater than CAFG's maximum drawdown of -23.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSML and CAFG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QSMLCAFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.54%

-23.66%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-13.08%

-1.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.26%

-3.74%

-4.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-5.81%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

3.40%

+0.49%

Volatility

QSML vs. CAFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) is 6.17%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) has a volatility of 7.41%. This indicates that QSML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QSMLCAFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.17%

7.41%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

13.24%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.86%

21.41%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.27%

19.76%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.27%

19.76%

+1.51%