PortfoliosLab logo
QSML vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QSML and SCHG is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

QSML vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QSML:

-0.01

SCHG:

0.68

Sortino Ratio

QSML:

0.16

SCHG:

0.98

Omega Ratio

QSML:

1.02

SCHG:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

QSML:

-0.02

SCHG:

0.63

Martin Ratio

QSML:

-0.04

SCHG:

2.07

Ulcer Index

QSML:

10.28%

SCHG:

7.13%

Daily Std Dev

QSML:

24.73%

SCHG:

25.37%

Max Drawdown

QSML:

-28.54%

SCHG:

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

QSML:

-14.67%

SCHG:

-5.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSML achieves a -7.47% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -1.01% return.


QSML

YTD

-7.47%

1M

4.86%

6M

-14.32%

1Y

-1.12%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SCHG

YTD

-1.01%

1M

5.59%

6M

-0.61%

1Y

17.22%

3Y*

21.07%

5Y*

18.23%

10Y*

15.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

QSML vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSML has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QSML vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSML
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QSML is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QSML is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QSML is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QSML is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QSML is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QSML is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHG is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHG is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHG is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHG is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHG is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QSML vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QSML Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSML and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

QSML vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

QSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than SCHG's 0.41% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QSML
Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund
0.35%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.41%0.40%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%1.09%

Drawdowns

QSML vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSML drawdown since its inception was -28.54%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSML and SCHG.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

QSML vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.75%. This indicates that QSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...