QRMI vs. TPYP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QRMI (Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QRMI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Global X, while TPYP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. QRMI is actively managed, while TPYP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QRMI returned 7.36%/yr vs 26.20%/yr for TPYP. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QRMI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.

Performance

QRMI vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRMI achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 21.62% return.

QRMI

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 2.38%
• 1Y: 9.91%
• 3Y*: 7.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TPYP

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: -3.57%
• YTD: 21.62%
• 6M: 21.85%
• 1Y: 24.89%
• 3Y*: 26.20%
• 5Y*: 18.21%
• 10Y*: 11.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRMI vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	2.46%	3.76%	14.72%	11.73%	-18.50%	-2.40%
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund	21.62%	7.59%	37.37%	10.51%	16.09%	5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between QRMI and TPYP is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021	0.24

The correlation between QRMI and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QRMI vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QRMI	TPYP
Technology	62.0%	-
Communication Services	13.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	-
Healthcare	3.5%	-
Industrials	3.5%	-
Utilities	1.2%	22.0%
Basic Materials	1.0%	0.1%
Energy	0.5%	68.8%
Financial Services	0.2%	2.4%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QRMI vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 51
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 53

TPYP

TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 60
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRMI vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QRMI	TPYP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.88	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	2.61	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.32	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	3.66	-1.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.61	9.01	-0.40

QRMI vs. TPYP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the TPYP Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRMI and TPYP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QRMI vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, smaller than the maximum TPYP drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and TPYP.

Drawdown Indicators

	QRMI	TPYP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.95%	-51.91%	+30.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.04%	-6.84%	+1.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.43%	-13.17%	+4.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.96%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-4.04%	+3.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.90%	-7.88%	-0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	2.77%	-1.62%

Volatility

QRMI vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is 2.24%, while Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that QRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QRMI	TPYP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.24%	5.29%	-3.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.92%	10.38%	-5.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.98%	13.33%	-7.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.35%	17.40%	-9.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.35%	21.93%	-13.58%

QRMI vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

QRMI vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison

QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.33%, more than TPYP's 3.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.33%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund	3.21%	3.91%	3.95%	4.83%	4.48%	4.86%	6.14%	4.45%	4.58%	3.71%	3.49%	2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QRMI and TPYP in my portfolio?

QRMI and TPYP have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QRMI or TPYP?

TPYP has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to QRMI (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRMI dropped -20.95% vs TPYP's -51.91%.

Which ETF is better, QRMI or TPYP?

On 3-year performance, TPYP leads with 26.20% vs 7.36% for QRMI. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QRMI has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QRMI or TPYP?

Over the 3-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 26.20% return vs 7.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QRMI or TPYP?

TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QRMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QRMI or TPYP?

QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.33%, compared with 3.21% for TPYP.

What is the main difference between QRMI and TPYP?

QRMI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while TPYP is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QRMI and 0.40% for TPYP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.