QRMI vs. BOTZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QRMI (Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QRMI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Global X, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. QRMI is actively managed, while BOTZ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QRMI returned 7.03%/yr vs 12.50%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QRMI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.

Performance

QRMI vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRMI achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 10.63% return.

QRMI

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 2.50%
• 6M: 3.76%
• 1Y: 9.82%
• 3Y*: 7.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BOTZ

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 10.63%
• 6M: 9.15%
• 1Y: 28.51%
• 3Y*: 12.50%
• 5Y*: 3.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRMI vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	2.50%	3.76%	14.72%	11.73%	-18.50%	-1.88%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	10.63%	14.17%	12.26%	38.97%	-42.69%	-0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between QRMI and BOTZ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021	0.65

The correlation between QRMI and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

QRMI vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QRMI	BOTZ
Technology	53.8%	31.8%
Communication Services	15.8%	4.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	0.0%
Healthcare	4.2%	9.0%
Industrials	2.8%	48.6%
Utilities	1.4%	0.0%
Basic Materials	1.1%	0.0%
Energy	0.6%	0.5%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.9%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QRMI vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 50
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 32
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRMI vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QRMI	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.19	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	1.82	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.21	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	1.48	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.60	5.08	+3.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QRMI vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRMI and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QRMI	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	1.19	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.44	-0.22

Drawdowns

QRMI vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and BOTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QRMI	BOTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.95%	-55.54%	+34.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.04%	-19.34%	+14.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.43%	-29.02%	+20.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-3.72%	+3.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.98%	-18.32%	+10.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.14%	5.63%	-4.49%

Volatility

QRMI vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is 0.67%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that QRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QRMI	BOTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	7.76%	-7.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.43%	18.41%	-13.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.72%	23.97%	-18.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.33%	26.72%	-18.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.33%	25.72%	-17.39%

QRMI vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

QRMI vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.20%, more than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.59%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.20%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QRMI and BOTZ in my portfolio?

QRMI and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QRMI or BOTZ?

BOTZ has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to QRMI (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRMI dropped -20.95% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

Which ETF is better, QRMI or BOTZ?

On 3-year performance, BOTZ leads with 12.50% vs 7.03% for QRMI. On fees, QRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QRMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QRMI or BOTZ?

Over the 3-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QRMI or BOTZ?

QRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QRMI or BOTZ?

QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.20%, compared with 0.59% for BOTZ.

What is the main difference between QRMI and BOTZ?

QRMI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BOTZ is Robotics. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QRMI and 0.68% for BOTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.