QRFT vs. RPG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

QRFT (QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QRFT is actively managed, while RPG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QRFT returned 11.44%/yr vs 12.84%/yr for RPG. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QRFT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.

Performance

QRFT vs. RPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRFT achieves a 11.80% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 36.60% return.

QRFT

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 11.80%
• 6M: 11.24%
• 1Y: 28.25%
• 3Y*: 21.26%
• 5Y*: 11.44%
• 10Y*: —

RPG

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: 10.57%
• YTD: 36.60%
• 6M: 33.46%
• 1Y: 47.03%
• 3Y*: 29.74%
• 5Y*: 12.84%
• 10Y*: 15.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRFT vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF	11.80%	17.95%	21.36%	24.16%	-22.69%	22.74%	40.05%	15.22%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	36.60%	13.41%	28.23%	8.04%	-27.55%	29.40%	29.34%	10.45%

Correlation

The correlation between QRFT and RPG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019	0.88

The correlation between QRFT and RPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

QRFT vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QRFT	RPG
Technology	38.7%	46.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	14.7%
Financial Services	10.6%	5.3%
Healthcare	8.6%	6.4%
Industrials	8.4%	14.0%
Communication Services	8.2%	5.4%
Energy	4.3%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	1.1%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.2%
Real Estate	1.6%	1.0%
Utilities	1.5%	2.4%

Return for Risk

QRFT vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRFT

QRFT Risk / Return Rank: 65
QRFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QRFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QRFT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QRFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
QRFT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

RPG

RPG Risk / Return Rank: 73
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRFT vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QRFT	RPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	2.19	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.91	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.38	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	4.27	-1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.25	16.15	-2.90

QRFT vs. RPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRFT Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the RPG Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRFT and RPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QRFT vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRFT drawdown since its inception was -30.19%, smaller than the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRFT and RPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QRFT	RPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.19%	-53.27%	+23.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.12%	-11.08%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.99%	-24.75%	+4.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.20%	-35.59%	+7.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	0.00%	-1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.76%	-8.83%	+2.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	2.92%	-0.78%

Volatility

QRFT vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) is 5.45%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that QRFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QRFT	RPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	9.89%	-4.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.00%	18.39%	-7.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.89%	21.61%	-7.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.46%	23.77%	-6.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.12%	22.88%	-2.76%

QRFT vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRFT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

QRFT vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison

QRFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, more than RPG's 0.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF	0.25%	0.27%	0.52%	0.77%	0.83%	0.05%	1.81%	4.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	0.19%	0.24%	0.25%	1.44%	0.74%	0.00%	0.46%	0.83%	0.47%	0.56%	0.43%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QRFT and RPG in my portfolio?

QRFT and RPG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QRFT or RPG?

RPG has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to QRFT (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRFT dropped -30.19% vs RPG's -53.27%.

Which ETF is better, QRFT or RPG?

On 5-year performance, RPG leads with 12.84% vs 11.44% for QRFT. On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QRFT has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QRFT or RPG?

Over the 5-year period, RPG has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QRFT or RPG?

RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QRFT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QRFT or RPG?

QRFT has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.19% for RPG.

What is the main difference between QRFT and RPG?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QRFT and 0.35% for RPG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.