QRFT vs. HTUS
Compare and contrast key facts about QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS).
QRFT and HTUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QRFT is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on May 21, 2019. HTUS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Jun 25, 2015.
Performance
QRFT vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QRFT vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | -4.73% | 17.95% | 21.36% | 24.16% | -22.69% | 22.74% | 40.05% | 14.90% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | -3.85% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 24.29% | 13.21% | 11.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QRFT achieves a -4.73% return, which is significantly lower than HTUS's -3.85% return.
QRFT
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- YTD
- -4.73%
- 6M
- -2.37%
- 1Y
- 16.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- —
HTUS
- 1D
- 3.72%
- 1M
- -4.31%
- YTD
- -3.85%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 17.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QRFT vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRFT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QRFT vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
QRFT
HTUS
QRFT vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QRFT | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.79 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 1.37 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 0.99 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.42 | 6.79 | -0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QRFT | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.79 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.71 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.51 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between QRFT and HTUS is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QRFT vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
QRFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than HTUS's 12.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.52% | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.05% | 1.81% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 12.37% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
Drawdowns
QRFT vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRFT drawdown since its inception was -30.19%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRFT and HTUS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRFT | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.19% | -47.50% | +17.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -17.90% | +5.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.20% | -24.41% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.49% | -5.29% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -4.11% | -2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 2.61% | +0.05% |
Volatility
QRFT vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) is 5.63%, while Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that QRFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QRFT | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 6.36% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 9.24% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.97% | 21.90% | -2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 18.99% | -1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 21.38% | -1.14% |