QRFT vs. HTUS
QRFT (QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QRFT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while HTUS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QRFT returned 10.80%/yr vs 14.56%/yr for HTUS. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QRFT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for HTUS.
Performance
QRFT vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QRFT achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly higher than HTUS's 8.76% return.
QRFT
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 23.13%
- 3Y*
- 20.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.80%
- 10Y*
- —
HTUS
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 7.79%
- 1Y
- 22.82%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
QRFT vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 9.56% | 17.95% | 21.36% | 24.16% | -22.69% | 22.74% | 40.05% | 15.22% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 8.76% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 24.29% | 13.21% | 12.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between QRFT and HTUS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019 | 0.74 |
The correlation between QRFT and HTUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QRFT vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
QRFT
HTUS
QRFT vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QRFT | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.37 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 2.64 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.72 | 12.94 | -2.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QRFT vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRFT drawdown since its inception was -30.19%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRFT and HTUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRFT | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.19% | -47.50% | +17.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -8.68% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.99% | -24.41% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.20% | -24.41% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.03% | -2.84% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -4.05% | -2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 1.77% | +0.39% |
Volatility
QRFT vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) at 3.99%. This indicates that QRFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QRFT | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 3.99% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 9.97% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.93% | 11.98% | +1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 19.09% | -1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 21.48% | -1.36% |
QRFT vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRFT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
QRFT vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
QRFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than HTUS's 10.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.93% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.52% | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.05% | 1.81% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, QRFT and HTUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QRFT has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to HTUS (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRFT dropped -30.19% vs HTUS's -47.50%.
On 5-year performance, HTUS leads with 14.56% vs 10.80% for QRFT. On fees, QRFT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 14.56% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QRFT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.93%, compared with 0.26% for QRFT.
QRFT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HTUS is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QRFT and 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QRFT and HTUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer