PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTUS vs. ARGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTUS vs. ARGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTUS achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly higher than ARGT's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, HTUS has underperformed ARGT with an annualized return of 12.59%, while ARGT has yielded a comparatively higher 17.83% annualized return.


HTUS

1D
0.24%
1M
5.23%
YTD
11.94%
6M
13.14%
1Y
30.10%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
15.60%
10Y*
12.59%

ARGT

1D
-1.20%
1M
9.08%
YTD
6.99%
6M
6.82%
1Y
10.03%
3Y*
35.03%
5Y*
28.03%
10Y*
17.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTUS vs. ARGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
11.94%16.57%25.02%30.11%-13.00%24.29%13.21%20.27%-10.04%14.19%
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
6.99%11.51%63.46%53.64%11.80%3.83%14.58%14.50%-32.62%53.87%

Correlation

The correlation between HTUS and ARGT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2015

0.43

HTUS vs. ARGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HTUS
ARGT

Technology

35.6%

-

Financial Services

11.8%
13.7%

Communication Services

11.2%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
26.3%

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
6.9%

Energy

3.5%
22.2%

Utilities

2.4%
5.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
13.3%

Technology

HTUS
35.6%
ARGT

-

Financial Services

HTUS
11.8%
ARGT
13.7%

Communication Services

HTUS
11.2%
ARGT
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HTUS
10.1%
ARGT
26.3%

Healthcare

HTUS
8.5%
ARGT

-

Industrials

HTUS
8.3%
ARGT
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

HTUS
4.9%
ARGT
6.9%

Energy

HTUS
3.5%
ARGT
22.2%

Utilities

HTUS
2.4%
ARGT
5.1%

Real Estate

HTUS
1.9%
ARGT
1.3%

Basic Materials

HTUS
1.8%
ARGT
13.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTUS vs. ARGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTUS
HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ARGT
ARGT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ARGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARGT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ARGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARGT Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTUS vs. ARGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTUSARGTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.63

0.28

+2.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.85

0.72

+3.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.09

+0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

0.37

+3.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.06

0.83

+17.23

HTUS vs. ARGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the ARGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTUS and ARGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTUSARGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

0.28

+2.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.88

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.57

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.31

+0.27

Drawdowns

HTUS vs. ARGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, smaller than the maximum ARGT drawdown of -61.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and ARGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTUSARGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.50%

-61.68%

+14.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-25.10%

+16.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.41%

-28.46%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.41%

-35.14%

+10.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

-61.68%

+14.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.99%

+4.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-22.06%

+18.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

11.19%

-9.51%

Volatility

HTUS vs. ARGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) is 2.42%, while Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) has a volatility of 9.79%. This indicates that HTUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTUSARGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

9.79%

-7.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.40%

20.07%

-10.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.49%

36.57%

-25.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.03%

31.89%

-12.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

31.43%

-9.98%

HTUS vs. ARGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than ARGT's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

HTUS vs. ARGT - Dividend Comparison

HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%, more than ARGT's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
0.79%0.84%1.41%1.59%2.45%0.93%0.28%1.21%1.34%0.49%0.36%0.89%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
10.62%11.89%17.80%1.18%5.63%7.20%3.77%0.92%8.69%8.29%3.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HTUS and ARGT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARGT has higher volatility (9.79%) compared to HTUS (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTUS dropped -47.50% vs ARGT's -61.68%.

On 10-year performance, ARGT leads with 17.83% vs 12.59% for HTUS. On fees, ARGT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARGT has performed better with a 17.83% return vs 12.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARGT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.

HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.62%, compared with 0.79% for ARGT.

HTUS is categorized as Long-Short, while ARGT is Latin America Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HTUS and 0.60% for ARGT.

HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTUS and ARGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer