HTUS vs. ARGT
HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) and ARGT (Global X MSCI Argentina ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTUS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while ARGT is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Argentina 25/50. HTUS is actively managed, while ARGT is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HTUS returned 12.59%/yr vs 17.83%/yr for ARGT. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HTUS charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ARGT.
Performance
HTUS vs. ARGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTUS achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly higher than ARGT's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, HTUS has underperformed ARGT with an annualized return of 12.59%, while ARGT has yielded a comparatively higher 17.83% annualized return.
HTUS
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 30.10%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 15.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
ARGT
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 9.08%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 6.82%
- 1Y
- 10.03%
- 3Y*
- 35.03%
- 5Y*
- 28.03%
- 10Y*
- 17.83%
HTUS vs. ARGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 11.94% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 24.29% | 13.21% | 20.27% | -10.04% | 14.19% |
ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF | 6.99% | 11.51% | 63.46% | 53.64% | 11.80% | 3.83% | 14.58% | 14.50% | -32.62% | 53.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTUS and ARGT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2015 | 0.43 |
HTUS vs. ARGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HTUS
ARGT
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
HTUS
ARGT
-
Financial Services
HTUS
ARGT
Communication Services
HTUS
ARGT
Consumer Cyclical
HTUS
ARGT
Healthcare
HTUS
ARGT
-
Industrials
HTUS
ARGT
Consumer Defensive
HTUS
ARGT
Energy
HTUS
ARGT
Utilities
HTUS
ARGT
Real Estate
HTUS
ARGT
Basic Materials
HTUS
ARGT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTUS vs. ARGT — Risk / Return Rank
HTUS
ARGT
HTUS vs. ARGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HTUS | ARGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.63 | 0.28 | +2.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.85 | 0.72 | +3.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.09 | +0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 0.37 | +3.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.06 | 0.83 | +17.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HTUS | ARGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 0.28 | +2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.88 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.57 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.31 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
HTUS vs. ARGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, smaller than the maximum ARGT drawdown of -61.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and ARGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTUS | ARGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.50% | -61.68% | +14.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -25.10% | +16.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.41% | -28.46% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.41% | -35.14% | +10.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.50% | -61.68% | +14.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.99% | +4.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.06% | -22.06% | +18.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 11.19% | -9.51% |
Volatility
HTUS vs. ARGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) is 2.42%, while Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) has a volatility of 9.79%. This indicates that HTUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTUS | ARGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 9.79% | -7.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.40% | 20.07% | -10.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 36.57% | -25.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 31.89% | -12.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 31.43% | -9.98% |
HTUS vs. ARGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than ARGT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTUS vs. ARGT - Dividend Comparison
HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%, more than ARGT's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF | 0.79% | 0.84% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 2.45% | 0.93% | 0.28% | 1.21% | 1.34% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 0.89% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.62% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTUS and ARGT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARGT has higher volatility (9.79%) compared to HTUS (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTUS dropped -47.50% vs ARGT's -61.68%.
On 10-year performance, ARGT leads with 17.83% vs 12.59% for HTUS. On fees, ARGT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARGT has performed better with a 17.83% return vs 12.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARGT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.62%, compared with 0.79% for ARGT.
HTUS is categorized as Long-Short, while ARGT is Latin America Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HTUS and 0.60% for ARGT.
HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTUS and ARGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer