HTUS vs. LBAY
Compare and contrast key facts about Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY).
HTUS and LBAY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HTUS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Jun 25, 2015. LBAY is an actively managed fund by Toroso Investments. It was launched on Nov 16, 2020.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HTUS or LBAY.
Key characteristics
HTUS | LBAY | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 28.23% | 3.99% |
1Y Return | 40.38% | 9.32% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 14.99% | 6.56% |
Sharpe Ratio | 3.06 | 0.93 |
Sortino Ratio | 4.13 | 1.36 |
Omega Ratio | 1.59 | 1.17 |
Calmar Ratio | 5.75 | 0.62 |
Martin Ratio | 25.53 | 3.82 |
Ulcer Index | 1.59% | 2.44% |
Daily Std Dev | 13.26% | 9.99% |
Max Drawdown | -47.47% | -15.99% |
Current Drawdown | -0.14% | -7.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTUS and LBAY is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
HTUS vs. LBAY - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, HTUS achieves a 28.23% return, which is significantly higher than LBAY's 3.99% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HTUS vs. LBAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than LBAY's 1.09% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HTUS vs. LBAY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HTUS vs. LBAY - Dividend Comparison
HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than LBAY's 3.48% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hull Tactical US ETF | 0.92% | 1.18% | 7.86% | 7.21% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 10.57% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF | 3.48% | 3.47% | 2.74% | 2.96% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HTUS vs. LBAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.47%, which is greater than LBAY's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and LBAY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HTUS vs. LBAY - Volatility Comparison
Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) at 3.21%. This indicates that HTUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.