PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQS vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQS vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQS achieves a 27.27% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 9.70% return.


QQQS

1D
-1.70%
1M
5.91%
YTD
27.27%
6M
27.40%
1Y
79.99%
3Y*
15.89%
5Y*
10Y*

RSP

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.18%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQS vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
27.27%23.03%10.20%-1.94%6.56%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.70%11.21%12.79%13.70%8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQS and RSP is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022

0.76

The correlation between QQQS and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQS vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQS
RSP

Technology

42.1%
19.6%

Healthcare

41.0%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
9.9%

Industrials

4.8%
14.1%

Communication Services

2.4%
3.7%

Energy

2.2%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
6.5%

Basic Materials

1.0%
4.1%

Financial Services

0.0%
14.5%

Real Estate

-

6.0%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Technology

QQQS
42.1%
RSP
19.6%

Healthcare

QQQS
41.0%
RSP
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQS
5.2%
RSP
9.9%

Industrials

QQQS
4.8%
RSP
14.1%

Communication Services

QQQS
2.4%
RSP
3.7%

Energy

QQQS
2.2%
RSP
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

QQQS
1.4%
RSP
6.5%

Basic Materials

QQQS
1.0%
RSP
4.1%

Financial Services

QQQS
0.0%
RSP
14.5%

Real Estate

QQQS

-

RSP
6.0%

Utilities

QQQS

-

RSP
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQS vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQS
QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQS vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQSRSPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.00

1.70

+1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.78

2.47

+1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.30

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.90

2.49

+3.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.70

9.48

+10.22

QQQS vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQS Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQS and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQSRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

1.70

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.57

+0.06

Drawdowns

QQQS vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQS drawdown since its inception was -38.06%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQS and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQSRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.06%

-59.92%

+21.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-7.85%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.32%

-17.81%

-16.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-0.38%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-6.65%

-6.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

2.06%

+2.01%

Volatility

QQQS vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.56%. This indicates that QQQS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQSRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

2.56%

+4.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

8.29%

+10.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.90%

11.56%

+15.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.34%

16.18%

+12.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.34%

18.35%

+9.99%

QQQS vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQQS and RSP have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQS vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

QQQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
2.73%3.48%0.80%0.68%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQS and RSP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQS has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQS dropped -38.06% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 3-year performance, QQQS leads with 15.89% vs 15.23% for RSP. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QQQS has performed better with a 15.89% return vs 15.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQS and RSP have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

QQQS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. QQQS tracks Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index.

QQQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQS and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer