PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQS vs. ISCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQS vs. ISCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQS achieves a 27.27% return, which is significantly higher than ISCB's 11.43% return.


QQQS

1D
-1.70%
1M
5.91%
YTD
27.27%
6M
27.40%
1Y
79.99%
3Y*
15.89%
5Y*
10Y*

ISCB

1D
-0.67%
1M
2.77%
YTD
11.43%
6M
11.42%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
9.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQS vs. ISCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
27.27%23.03%10.20%-1.94%6.56%
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
11.43%12.46%10.90%19.51%3.60%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQS and ISCB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022

0.87

The correlation between QQQS and ISCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQS vs. ISCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQS
ISCB

Technology

42.1%
14.6%

Healthcare

41.0%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
11.8%

Industrials

4.8%
18.5%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.6%

Energy

2.2%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
3.4%

Basic Materials

1.0%
4.6%

Financial Services

0.0%
15.9%

Real Estate

-

8.2%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

QQQS
42.1%
ISCB
14.6%

Healthcare

QQQS
41.0%
ISCB
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQS
5.2%
ISCB
11.8%

Industrials

QQQS
4.8%
ISCB
18.5%

Communication Services

QQQS
2.4%
ISCB
2.6%

Energy

QQQS
2.2%
ISCB
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

QQQS
1.4%
ISCB
3.4%

Basic Materials

QQQS
1.0%
ISCB
4.6%

Financial Services

QQQS
0.0%
ISCB
15.9%

Real Estate

QQQS

-

ISCB
8.2%

Utilities

QQQS

-

ISCB
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQS vs. ISCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQS
QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCB
ISCB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ISCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQS vs. ISCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQSISCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.31

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.90

3.15

+2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.70

11.26

+8.44

QQQS vs. ISCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQS Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the ISCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQS and ISCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQSISCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

1.80

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.38

+0.25

Drawdowns

QQQS vs. ISCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQS drawdown since its inception was -38.06%, smaller than the maximum ISCB drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQS and ISCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQSISCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.06%

-61.25%

+23.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-9.39%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.32%

-26.22%

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-0.67%

-1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-9.80%

-3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

2.63%

+1.44%

Volatility

QQQS vs. ISCB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) at 4.28%. This indicates that QQQS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQSISCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

4.28%

+3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

11.43%

+7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.90%

16.51%

+10.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.34%

21.39%

+6.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.34%

22.68%

+5.66%

QQQS vs. ISCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQS vs. ISCB - Dividend Comparison

QQQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than ISCB's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
1.27%1.38%1.31%1.49%1.63%1.26%1.26%1.25%1.60%1.24%1.58%1.40%
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
2.73%3.48%0.80%0.68%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQS and ISCB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQS has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to ISCB (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQS dropped -38.06% vs ISCB's -61.25%.

On 3-year performance, ISCB leads with 16.41% vs 15.89% for QQQS. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ISCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ISCB has performed better with a 16.41% return vs 15.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQQS.

QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 1.27% for ISCB.

QQQS tracks Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index, while ISCB tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQQS and 0.04% for ISCB.

QQQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQS and ISCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer