QQQS vs. ISCB
QQQS (Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF) and ISCB (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - QQQS tracks the Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index while ISCB tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQQS returned 15.89%/yr vs 16.41%/yr for ISCB. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQS charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ISCB.
Performance
QQQS vs. ISCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQS achieves a 27.27% return, which is significantly higher than ISCB's 11.43% return.
QQQS
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 27.27%
- 6M
- 27.40%
- 1Y
- 79.99%
- 3Y*
- 15.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCB
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
QQQS vs. ISCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | 27.27% | 23.03% | 10.20% | -1.94% | 6.56% |
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 11.43% | 12.46% | 10.90% | 19.51% | 3.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQS and ISCB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between QQQS and ISCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQS vs. ISCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQS
ISCB
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QQQS
ISCB
Healthcare
QQQS
ISCB
Consumer Cyclical
QQQS
ISCB
Industrials
QQQS
ISCB
Communication Services
QQQS
ISCB
Energy
QQQS
ISCB
Consumer Defensive
QQQS
ISCB
Basic Materials
QQQS
ISCB
Financial Services
QQQS
ISCB
Real Estate
QQQS
-
ISCB
Utilities
QQQS
-
ISCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQS vs. ISCB — Risk / Return Rank
QQQS
ISCB
QQQS vs. ISCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQS | ISCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.31 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.90 | 3.15 | +2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.70 | 11.26 | +8.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQS | ISCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00 | 1.80 | +1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.38 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
QQQS vs. ISCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQS drawdown since its inception was -38.06%, smaller than the maximum ISCB drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQS and ISCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQS | ISCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.06% | -61.25% | +23.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.63% | -9.39% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.32% | -26.22% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -0.67% | -1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -9.80% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 2.63% | +1.44% |
Volatility
QQQS vs. ISCB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) at 4.28%. This indicates that QQQS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQS | ISCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 4.28% | +3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.49% | 11.43% | +7.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.90% | 16.51% | +10.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.34% | 21.39% | +6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.34% | 22.68% | +5.66% |
QQQS vs. ISCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQS vs. ISCB - Dividend Comparison
QQQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than ISCB's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 1.27% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.49% | 1.63% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.25% | 1.60% | 1.24% | 1.58% | 1.40% |
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | 2.73% | 3.48% | 0.80% | 0.68% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQS and ISCB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQS has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to ISCB (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQS dropped -38.06% vs ISCB's -61.25%.
On 3-year performance, ISCB leads with 16.41% vs 15.89% for QQQS. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ISCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ISCB has performed better with a 16.41% return vs 15.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQQS.
QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 1.27% for ISCB.
QQQS tracks Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index, while ISCB tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQQS and 0.04% for ISCB.
QQQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQS and ISCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer