QQQP vs. UCO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO).

QQQP and UCO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQQP is an actively managed fund by Tradr. It was launched on Sep 30, 2024. UCO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). It was launched on Nov 24, 2008.

Performance

QQQP vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QQQP vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF	-11.26%	30.21%	10.88%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	92.55%	-29.75%	2.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQP achieves a -11.26% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 92.55% return.

QQQP

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: -8.61%
• YTD: -11.26%
• 6M: -9.55%
• 1Y: 39.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UCO

• 1D: -5.34%
• 1M: 34.20%
• YTD: 92.55%
• 6M: 67.42%
• 1Y: 37.47%
• 3Y*: 12.01%
• 5Y*: 21.35%
• 10Y*: -9.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQP vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQP has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.

QQQP

Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF

UCO

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil

Return for Risk

QQQP vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQP

QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 51
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 52
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 52

UCO

UCO Risk / Return Rank: 35
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 36
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQP vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQP	UCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	0.66	+0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	1.20	+0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.15	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	1.08	+0.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.63	1.80	+3.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQP vs. UCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQP Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the UCO Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQP and UCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQP	UCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	0.66	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	-0.36	+0.76

Correlation

The correlation between QQQP and UCO is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

QQQP vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQP nor UCO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QQQP vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQP drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQP and UCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQP	UCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.50%	-99.95%	+57.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.35%	-34.77%	+9.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.71%	-99.40%	+81.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.83%	-85.35%	+77.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.38%	20.76%	-13.38%

Volatility

QQQP vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) is 14.23%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 25.64%. This indicates that QQQP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQP	UCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.23%	25.64%	-11.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.26%	40.74%	-14.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.01%	57.38%	-10.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.93%	59.11%	-14.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.93%	71.31%	-26.38%