QQQP vs. ARCX
QQQP (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF) and ARCX (Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQP returned 73.51% vs -84.82% for ARCX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
QQQP vs. ARCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQP achieves a 33.67% return, which is significantly higher than ARCX's -60.14% return.
QQQP
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 33.67%
- 6M
- 31.35%
- 1Y
- 73.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARCX
- 1D
- -5.46%
- 1M
- -31.06%
- YTD
- -60.14%
- 6M
- -68.25%
- 1Y
- -84.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQP vs. ARCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF | 33.67% | 27.71% |
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF | -60.14% | -71.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQP and ARCX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025 | 0.55 |
The correlation between QQQP and ARCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQP vs. ARCX — Risk / Return Rank
QQQP
ARCX
QQQP vs. ARCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQP | ARCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.90 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | -0.92 | +3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | -1.22 | +11.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQP vs. ARCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQP drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, smaller than the maximum ARCX drawdown of -91.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQP and ARCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQP | ARCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.50% | -91.99% | +49.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.35% | -91.99% | +66.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -90.94% | +89.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -65.37% | +58.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.04% | 69.52% | -62.48% |
Volatility
QQQP vs. ARCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) is 14.48%, while Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) has a volatility of 47.50%. This indicates that QQQP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQP | ARCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.48% | 47.50% | -33.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.11% | 89.91% | -62.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.24% | 138.39% | -104.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.27% | 140.88% | -96.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.27% | 140.88% | -96.61% |
QQQP vs. ARCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QQQP and ARCX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
QQQP vs. ARCX - Dividend Comparison
Neither QQQP nor ARCX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQP and ARCX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARCX has higher volatility (47.50%) compared to QQQP (14.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQP dropped -42.50% vs ARCX's -91.99%.
On 1-year performance, QQQP leads with 73.51% vs -84.82% for ARCX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQP has been the lower-risk option at 14.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQP has performed better with a 73.51% return vs -84.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQP and ARCX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
QQQP and ARCX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
QQQP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQP and ARCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer