PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQP vs. APPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQP vs. APPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQP achieves a 24.11% return, which is significantly higher than APPX's -73.02% return.


QQQP

1D
-3.72%
1M
-3.56%
6M
19.17%
YTD
24.11%
1Y
47.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APPX

1D
-25.22%
1M
-25.41%
6M
-71.21%
YTD
-73.02%
1Y
-12.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQP vs. APPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
24.11%60.80%
APPX
Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF
-73.02%344.96%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQP and APPX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQP vs. APPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQP
QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

APPX
APPX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
APPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
APPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
APPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
APPX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQP vs. APPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQPAPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.12

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

-0.15

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

-0.24

+6.81

QQQP vs. APPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQP Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the APPX Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQP and APPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQP vs. APPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQP drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, smaller than the maximum APPX drawdown of -82.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQP and APPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQPAPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-82.40%

+39.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.35%

-82.40%

+57.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.96%

-79.03%

+70.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.25%

-40.01%

+32.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.24%

52.46%

-45.22%

Volatility

QQQP vs. APPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) is 14.77%, while Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF (APPX) has a volatility of 48.07%. This indicates that QQQP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQPAPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.77%

48.07%

-33.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.96%

127.67%

-98.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.67%

145.97%

-110.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.38%

141.75%

-97.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.38%

141.75%

-97.37%

QQQP vs. APPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQQP and APPX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.


Dividends

QQQP vs. APPX - Dividend Comparison

QQQP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.78%.


PositionTTM2025
APPX
Tradr 2X Long APP Daily ETF
34.78%9.38%
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQP and APPX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APPX has higher volatility (48.07%) compared to QQQP (14.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQP dropped -42.50% vs APPX's -82.40%.

On 1-year performance, QQQP leads with 47.44% vs -12.69% for APPX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQP has been the lower-risk option at 14.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQP has performed better with a 47.44% return vs -12.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQP and APPX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

APPX has the higher dividend yield at 34.78%, compared with 0.00% for QQQP.

QQQP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQP and APPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer