QQQJ vs. USL
QQQJ (Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQJ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQJ returned 7.79%/yr vs 17.05%/yr for USL. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQJ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
QQQJ vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a 23.83% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return.
QQQJ
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 10.77%
- YTD
- 23.83%
- 6M
- 23.61%
- 1Y
- 47.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.59%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 60.58%
- 6M
- 56.11%
- 1Y
- 56.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 17.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
QQQJ vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 23.83% | 20.44% | 15.36% | 13.68% | -28.25% | 9.76% | 15.25% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 60.58% | -12.37% | 8.30% | -1.11% | 27.10% | 62.48% | 14.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQJ and USL is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.08 |
The correlation between QQQJ and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQQJ vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQJ
USL
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
QQQJ
USL
-
Healthcare
QQQJ
USL
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQQJ
USL
-
Industrials
QQQJ
USL
-
Communication Services
QQQJ
USL
-
Basic Materials
QQQJ
USL
-
Consumer Defensive
QQQJ
USL
-
Energy
QQQJ
USL
-
Utilities
QQQJ
USL
-
Financial Services
QQQJ
USL
Real Estate
QQQJ
-
USL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQJ vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
QQQJ
USL
QQQJ vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQJ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.33 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 3.39 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.19 | 6.85 | +10.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQJ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 1.99 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.57 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.01 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
QQQJ vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQJ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.57% | -89.06% | +49.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -16.76% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.46% | -23.33% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.57% | -33.82% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -39.10% | +38.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.73% | -61.45% | +45.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 8.27% | -5.53% |
Volatility
QQQJ vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) is 5.59%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that QQQJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQJ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 10.57% | -4.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.65% | 23.34% | -8.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.06% | 28.59% | -10.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 30.09% | -8.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.05% | 32.34% | -10.29% |
QQQJ vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQJ vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 0.71% | 0.85% | 0.77% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 0.09% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQJ and USL have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to QQQJ (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQJ dropped -39.57% vs USL's -89.06%.
On 5-year performance, USL leads with 17.05% vs 7.79% for QQQJ. On fees, QQQJ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 17.05% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQJ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
QQQJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
QQQJ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. QQQJ tracks NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQJ and 0.88% for USL.
QQQJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQJ and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer