PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQJ vs. PSCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQJ vs. PSCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a 24.07% return, which is significantly lower than PSCT's 56.03% return.


QQQJ

1D
0.33%
1M
13.00%
YTD
24.07%
6M
25.59%
1Y
49.35%
3Y*
22.53%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*

PSCT

1D
3.45%
1M
16.44%
YTD
56.03%
6M
55.93%
1Y
107.14%
3Y*
23.93%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*
16.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQJ vs. PSCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
24.07%20.44%15.36%13.68%-28.25%9.76%15.25%
PSCT
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF
56.03%18.63%-1.06%20.81%-22.50%26.26%29.19%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQJ and PSCT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.85

The correlation between QQQJ and PSCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQJ vs. PSCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQJ
PSCT

Technology

39.3%
85.2%

Healthcare

18.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%

-

Industrials

11.2%
5.1%

Communication Services

6.8%

-

Basic Materials

2.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.6%

-

Energy

2.6%
5.0%

Utilities

2.6%

-

Financial Services

1.0%
3.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

QQQJ
39.3%
PSCT
85.2%

Healthcare

QQQJ
18.3%
PSCT

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQQJ
11.4%
PSCT

-

Industrials

QQQJ
11.2%
PSCT
5.1%

Communication Services

QQQJ
6.8%
PSCT

-

Basic Materials

QQQJ
2.7%
PSCT

-

Consumer Defensive

QQQJ
2.6%
PSCT

-

Energy

QQQJ
2.6%
PSCT
5.0%

Utilities

QQQJ
2.6%
PSCT

-

Financial Services

QQQJ
1.0%
PSCT
3.7%

Real Estate

QQQJ

-

PSCT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQJ vs. PSCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQJ
QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCT
PSCT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PSCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQJ vs. PSCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQJPSCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.74

3.62

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.64

4.10

-0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.52

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

7.28

-3.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.42

30.78

-12.36

QQQJ vs. PSCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the PSCT Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQJ and PSCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQJPSCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

3.62

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.53

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.63

-0.14

Drawdowns

QQQJ vs. PSCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, roughly equal to the maximum PSCT drawdown of -40.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and PSCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQJPSCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.57%

-40.44%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-14.80%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.46%

-33.96%

+11.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.57%

-34.80%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.75%

-7.91%

-7.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

3.50%

-0.76%

Volatility

QQQJ vs. PSCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) is 5.48%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) has a volatility of 8.85%. This indicates that QQQJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQJPSCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

8.85%

-3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.65%

21.10%

-6.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.08%

29.78%

-11.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.03%

27.68%

-5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.06%

26.67%

-4.61%

QQQJ vs. PSCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCT's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQJ vs. PSCT - Dividend Comparison

QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than PSCT's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCT
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF
0.01%0.02%0.01%0.02%0.00%0.01%0.08%0.22%0.47%0.19%0.25%0.15%
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
0.71%0.85%0.77%0.67%0.76%0.91%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQJ and PSCT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCT has higher volatility (8.85%) compared to QQQJ (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQJ dropped -39.57% vs PSCT's -40.44%.

On 5-year performance, PSCT leads with 14.48% vs 8.06% for QQQJ. On fees, QQQJ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PSCT has performed better with a 14.48% return vs 8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQJ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCT.

QQQJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.01% for PSCT.

QQQJ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PSCT is Technology Equities. QQQJ tracks NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while PSCT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQJ and 0.29% for PSCT.

PSCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQJ and PSCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer