QQQJ vs. QLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD).
QQQJ and QLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQQJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both QQQJ and QLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QQQJ vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQQJ vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | -1.59% | 20.44% | 15.36% | 13.68% | -28.25% | 9.76% | 15.25% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | -13.35% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 12.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's -13.35% return.
QQQJ
- 1D
- 4.35%
- 1M
- -4.74%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 25.98%
- 3Y*
- 13.31%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- —
QLD
- 1D
- 6.72%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- YTD
- -13.35%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- 37.53%
- 3Y*
- 35.41%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 29.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQQJ vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QQQJ vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
QQQJ
QLD
QQQJ vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQJ | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 0.84 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 1.43 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 1.49 | +0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.73 | 4.88 | +2.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQJ | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.84 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.34 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.53 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQJ and QLD is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QQQJ vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than QLD's 0.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 0.89% | 0.85% | 0.77% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
QQQJ vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and QLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQJ | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.57% | -83.13% | +43.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -25.13% | +11.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.57% | -63.68% | +24.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.00% | -20.10% | +12.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.20% | -18.30% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 7.67% | -4.39% |
Volatility
QQQJ vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) is 8.68%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that QQQJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQQJ | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.68% | 12.96% | -4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.52% | 25.55% | -11.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.37% | 44.91% | -22.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.98% | 44.77% | -22.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 44.47% | -22.36% |