QQQJ vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QQQJ (Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QQQJ is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQJ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

QQQJ vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a 23.83% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 82.10% return.

QQQJ

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 10.77%
• YTD: 23.83%
• 6M: 23.61%
• 1Y: 47.01%
• 3Y*: 22.59%
• 5Y*: 7.79%
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: 21.14%
• YTD: 82.10%
• 6M: 57.24%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQJ vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	23.83%	1.44%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	82.10%	-36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQJ and MEME is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.74

QQQJ vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQJ	MEME
Technology	39.3%	58.8%
Healthcare	18.3%	5.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	-
Industrials	11.2%	29.9%
Communication Services	6.8%	5.5%
Basic Materials	2.7%	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	-
Energy	2.6%	4.8%
Utilities	2.6%	10.7%
Financial Services	1.0%	5.7%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

QQQJ vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQJ

QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 80
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 76
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQJ vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQJ	MEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.19	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQJ	MEME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.33	+0.16

Drawdowns

QQQJ vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQJ	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.57%	-48.78%	+9.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-4.32%	+4.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.73%	-29.74%	+14.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQQJ	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.59%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.65%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.06%	73.99%	-55.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.02%	73.99%	-51.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.05%	73.99%	-51.94%

QQQJ vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQJ vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	0.71%	0.85%	0.77%	0.67%	0.76%	0.91%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQJ and MEME in my portfolio?

QQQJ and MEME have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQQJ or MEME?

On fees, QQQJ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQJ or MEME?

QQQJ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQJ or MEME?

QQQJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

What is the main difference between QQQJ and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQJ and 0.69% for MEME.