PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQI vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQI vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQI vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
-3.45%18.62%19.83%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-3.66%17.82%21.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a -3.45% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.66% return.


QQQI

1D
1.01%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
-3.45%
6M
-0.97%
1Y
21.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.79%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-3.66%
6M
-1.41%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
14.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQI vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQI vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQIVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.01

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

1.53

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.55

+0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.69

7.31

+1.38

QQQI vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQIVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.01

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.83

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and VOO is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QQQI vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.90%, more than VOO's 1.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
14.90%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and VOO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQIVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.00%

-33.99%

+13.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-11.98%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.72%

-5.55%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-3.72%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.55%

-0.01%

Volatility

QQQI vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that QQQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQIVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

5.34%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.23%

9.47%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.72%

18.11%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

16.82%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.48%

17.99%

-0.51%