QQQH vs. XOMO
QQQH (NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF) and XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQH is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos, while XOMO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQH returned 13.37% vs 31.71% for XOMO. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. QQQH charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for XOMO.
Performance
QQQH vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQH achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 19.62% return.
QQQH
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 6.29%
- YTD
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- 13.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.98%
XOMO
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 19.62%
- 1Y
- 31.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.75M | $1.56M | $1.79M | |
| $575.62K | $697.28K | $695.47K |
QQQH vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 6.32% | 14.17% | 25.98% | 8.51% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 19.62% | 6.90% | 6.11% | -8.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQH and XOMO is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023 | -0.06 |
The correlation between QQQH and XOMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQH vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQH
XOMO
QQQH vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQH | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 1.85 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | 4.61 | +2.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQH vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQH drawdown since its inception was -31.24%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQH and XOMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQH | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.24% | -18.90% | -12.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.96% | -17.25% | +10.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -8.06% | +6.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -7.50% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 6.89% | -5.00% |
Volatility
QQQH vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) is 4.21%, while YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that QQQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQH | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 6.24% | -2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 17.16% | -7.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 20.64% | -9.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.47% | 19.18% | -5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.47% | 19.18% | -5.71% |
QQQH vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQH vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison
QQQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.97%, less than XOMO's 37.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 8.97% | 8.86% | 7.53% | 7.18% | 9.05% | 7.77% | 7.48% | 0.65% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 37.24% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQH and XOMO have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOMO has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to QQQH (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQH dropped -31.24% vs XOMO's -18.90%.
On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 31.71% vs 13.37% for QQQH. On fees, QQQH is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QQQH has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 31.71% return vs 13.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQH is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 37.24%, compared with 8.97% for QQQH.
QQQH is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XOMO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Neos and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQH and 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQH and XOMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer