PortfoliosLab logo
QQQH vs. GPIQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QQQH and GPIQ is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

QQQH vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
42.44%
34.35%
QQQH
GPIQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QQQH:

0.13

GPIQ:

0.53

Sortino Ratio

QQQH:

1.40

GPIQ:

0.90

Omega Ratio

QQQH:

1.57

GPIQ:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

QQQH:

0.32

GPIQ:

0.57

Martin Ratio

QQQH:

3.20

GPIQ:

2.10

Ulcer Index

QQQH:

5.19%

GPIQ:

5.73%

Daily Std Dev

QQQH:

123.90%

GPIQ:

22.57%

Max Drawdown

QQQH:

-52.73%

GPIQ:

-21.06%

Current Drawdown

QQQH:

-6.66%

GPIQ:

-10.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQH achieves a -3.09% return, which is significantly higher than GPIQ's -5.50% return.


QQQH

YTD

-3.09%

1M

1.10%

6M

-0.50%

1Y

15.43%

5Y*

6.85%

10Y*

N/A

GPIQ

YTD

-5.50%

1M

1.10%

6M

-2.97%

1Y

9.98%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQH vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for QQQH: current value is 0.68%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QQQH: 0.68%
Expense ratio chart for GPIQ: current value is 0.29%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
GPIQ: 0.29%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QQQH vs. GPIQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQH is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQH is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQH is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQH is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQH is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQH is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GPIQ is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GPIQ is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GPIQ is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GPIQ is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GPIQ is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GPIQ is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QQQH vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for QQQH, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
QQQH: 0.13
GPIQ: 0.53
The chart of Sortino ratio for QQQH, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
QQQH: 1.40
GPIQ: 0.90
The chart of Omega ratio for QQQH, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
QQQH: 1.57
GPIQ: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for QQQH, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
QQQH: 0.32
GPIQ: 0.57
The chart of Martin ratio for QQQH, currently valued at 3.20, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
QQQH: 3.20
GPIQ: 2.10

The current QQQH Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQH and GPIQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.13
0.53
QQQH
GPIQ

Dividends

QQQH vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

QQQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.59%, less than GPIQ's 11.10% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
8.59%7.52%7.17%9.05%7.77%7.48%0.65%
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
11.10%9.18%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QQQH vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQH drawdown since its inception was -52.73%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQH and GPIQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-6.66%
-10.34%
QQQH
GPIQ

Volatility

QQQH vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) is 11.33%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 15.71%. This indicates that QQQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
11.33%
15.71%
QQQH
GPIQ