PortfoliosLab logo
QQQH vs. IWM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QQQH and IWM is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

QQQH vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QQQH:

0.14

IWM:

0.07

Sortino Ratio

QQQH:

1.40

IWM:

0.23

Omega Ratio

QQQH:

1.58

IWM:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

QQQH:

0.32

IWM:

0.03

Martin Ratio

QQQH:

3.16

IWM:

0.10

Ulcer Index

QQQH:

5.31%

IWM:

9.60%

Daily Std Dev

QQQH:

124.14%

IWM:

24.30%

Max Drawdown

QQQH:

-52.73%

IWM:

-59.05%

Current Drawdown

QQQH:

-2.13%

IWM:

-13.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQH achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's -5.21% return.


QQQH

YTD

1.61%

1M

9.30%

6M

3.96%

1Y

17.08%

3Y*

13.65%

5Y*

7.62%

10Y*

N/A

IWM

YTD

-5.21%

1M

12.06%

6M

-8.24%

1Y

1.58%

3Y*

7.34%

5Y*

10.68%

10Y*

6.72%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares Russell 2000 ETF

QQQH vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QQQH vs. IWM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQH is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQH is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQH is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQH is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQH is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQH is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWM is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWM is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWM is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWM is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWM is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWM is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QQQH vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QQQH Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQH and IWM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

QQQH vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

QQQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, more than IWM's 1.18% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
8.19%7.52%7.17%9.05%7.77%7.48%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
1.18%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%1.26%

Drawdowns

QQQH vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQH drawdown since its inception was -52.73%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQH and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

QQQH vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) is 4.44%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that QQQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...