QQQ vs. TMF
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.79%/yr vs -16.87%/yr for TMF. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
QQQ vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly higher than TMF's -5.18% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed TMF with an annualized return of 21.79%, while TMF has yielded a comparatively lower -16.87% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 17.85%
- 1Y
- 35.82%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.79%
TMF
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- -5.18%
- 6M
- -5.04%
- 1Y
- -4.90%
- 3Y*
- -19.82%
- 5Y*
- -31.10%
- 10Y*
- -16.87%
QQQ vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.57% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -5.18% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and TMF is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2009 | -0.19 |
The correlation between QQQ and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQQ vs. TMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
TMF
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQ
TMF
-
Communication Services
QQQ
TMF
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
TMF
-
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
TMF
-
Healthcare
QQQ
TMF
-
Industrials
QQQ
TMF
-
Utilities
QQQ
TMF
-
Basic Materials
QQQ
TMF
-
Energy
QQQ
TMF
-
Financial Services
QQQ
TMF
Real Estate
QQQ
TMF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
TMF
QQQ vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.99 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | -0.19 | +3.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | -0.41 | +11.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -92.89% | +9.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -26.51% | +14.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -56.31% | +33.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -88.81% | +53.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -92.89% | +57.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -92.15% | +88.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.75% | -43.70% | +10.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 11.96% | -8.76% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 7.56%, while Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 8.43% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.81% | 19.46% | -5.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 28.49% | -11.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 46.72% | -24.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 43.92% | -21.54% |
QQQ vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQ vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than TMF's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.11% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and TMF have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMF has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to QQQ (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs TMF's -92.89%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.79% vs -16.87% for TMF. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.79% return vs -16.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 1.01% for TMF.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer