QQQ vs. HUMN
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill. QQQ is passively managed, while HUMN is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HUMN.
Performance
QQQ vs. HUMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QQQ having a 20.71% return and HUMN slightly higher at 21.30%.
QQQ
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 41.26%
- 3Y*
- 27.01%
- 5Y*
- 17.37%
- 10Y*
- 22.17%
HUMN
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 24.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ vs. HUMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.71% | 13.80% |
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 21.30% | 20.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and HUMN is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.73 |
QQQ vs. HUMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
HUMN
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQ
HUMN
Communication Services
QQQ
HUMN
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
HUMN
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
HUMN
-
Healthcare
QQQ
HUMN
-
Industrials
QQQ
HUMN
Utilities
QQQ
HUMN
-
Basic Materials
QQQ
HUMN
Energy
QQQ
HUMN
-
Financial Services
QQQ
HUMN
Real Estate
QQQ
HUMN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. HUMN — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
HUMN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQ vs. HUMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.72 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. HUMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than HUMN's maximum drawdown of -20.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and HUMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -20.40% | -62.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -6.94% | +6.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -4.60% | -28.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | — | — |
Volatility
QQQ vs. HUMN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 30.73% | -13.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 30.73% | -8.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 30.73% | -8.31% |
QQQ vs. HUMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HUMN's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQ vs. HUMN - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than HUMN's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 0.60% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and HUMN have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.
HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while HUMN is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.75% for HUMN.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and HUMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer