PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QQQ vs. ARGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QQQ vs. ARGT

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and ARGT (Global X MSCI Argentina ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while ARGT is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Argentina 25/50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.79%/yr vs 17.70%/yr for ARGT. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ARGT.

Performance

QQQ vs. ARGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly higher than ARGT's 7.11% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed ARGT with an annualized return of 21.79%, while ARGT has yielded a comparatively lower 17.70% annualized return.

QQQ

1D
0.59%
1M
0.22%
YTD
17.57%
6M
17.85%
1Y
37.55%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
21.79%

ARGT

1D
-0.06%
1M
9.42%
YTD
7.11%
6M
9.09%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
33.30%
5Y*
27.23%
10Y*
17.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. ARGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		17.57%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF		7.11%11.51%63.46%53.64%11.80%3.83%14.58%14.50%-32.62%53.87%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and ARGT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2011

0.53

The correlation between QQQ and ARGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQ vs. ARGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
QQQ
ARGT

Technology

58.7%

-

Communication Services

14.3%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
23.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
6.7%

Healthcare

3.7%

-

Industrials

2.6%
8.2%

Utilities

1.2%
5.3%

Basic Materials

1.0%
13.1%

Energy

0.5%
22.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
16.0%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.4%

Technology

QQQ
58.7%
ARGT

-

Communication Services

QQQ
14.3%
ARGT
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQ
11.4%
ARGT
23.4%

Consumer Defensive

QQQ
6.4%
ARGT
6.7%

Healthcare

QQQ
3.7%
ARGT

-

Industrials

QQQ
2.6%
ARGT
8.2%

Utilities

QQQ
1.2%
ARGT
5.3%

Basic Materials

QQQ
1.0%
ARGT
13.1%

Energy

QQQ
0.5%
ARGT
22.5%

Financial Services

QQQ
0.2%
ARGT
16.0%

Real Estate

QQQ
0.1%
ARGT
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco QQQ ETF

Global X MSCI Argentina ETF

Often compared with QQQ:
QQQ vs. SPYQQQ vs. VOOQQQ vs. VGTQQQ vs. TQQQQQQ vs. SMHQQQ vs. QQQMQQQ vs. QQQI
Often compared with ARGT:
ARGT vs. EWZARGT vs. SPYARGT vs. VOOARGT vs. EDENARGT vs. EPUARGT vs. HTUSARGT vs. VGT

Return for Risk

QQQ vs. ARGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
ARGT
ARGT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ARGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARGT Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ARGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARGT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. ARGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QQQARGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.09
0.34

+1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.73
0.83

+1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.10

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

0.57

+2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

1.25

+9.97

QQQ vs. ARGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the ARGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and ARGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. ARGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than ARGT's maximum drawdown of -61.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and ARGT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QQQARGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-61.68%

-21.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-22.25%

+10.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-28.46%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-35.14%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-61.68%

+26.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-4.89%

+1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.75%

-22.02%

-10.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

10.34%

-7.14%

Volatility

QQQ vs. ARGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 7.56%, while Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) has a volatility of 11.28%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QQQARGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.56%

11.28%

-3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

21.26%

-7.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

37.19%

-20.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.55%

32.06%

-9.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.38%

31.50%

-9.12%

QQQ vs. ARGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ARGT's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQ vs. ARGT - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than ARGT's 0.79% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF		0.79%0.84%1.41%1.59%2.45%0.93%0.28%1.21%1.34%0.49%0.36%0.89%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

QQQ and ARGT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARGT has higher volatility (11.28%) compared to QQQ (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs ARGT's -61.68%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.79% vs 17.70% for ARGT. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.79% return vs 17.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ARGT.

ARGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ARGT is Latin America Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while ARGT tracks MSCI All Argentina 25/50. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.60% for ARGT.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and ARGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer