QQMG vs. VOO
QQMG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQMG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQMG returned 29.63%/yr vs 22.44%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQMG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
QQMG vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQMG achieves a 21.86% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return.
QQMG
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 11.51%
- YTD
- 21.86%
- 6M
- 20.50%
- 1Y
- 44.32%
- 3Y*
- 29.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
QQMG vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.86% | 22.16% | 25.66% | 55.00% | -31.56% | 5.01% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 3.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQMG and VOO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between QQMG and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQMG vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQMG
VOO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
-
Technology
QQMG
VOO
Communication Services
QQMG
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
QQMG
VOO
Consumer Defensive
QQMG
VOO
Healthcare
QQMG
VOO
Industrials
QQMG
VOO
Basic Materials
QQMG
VOO
Utilities
QQMG
VOO
Financial Services
QQMG
VOO
Real Estate
QQMG
VOO
Energy
QQMG
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQMG vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
QQMG
VOO
QQMG vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQMG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.43 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 3.16 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.08 | 14.73 | -1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQMG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 2.39 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.89 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
QQMG vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQMG drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQMG and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQMG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -33.99% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -8.90% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -18.69% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.70% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -3.69% | -5.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 1.91% | +1.49% |
Volatility
QQMG vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that QQMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQMG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 2.84% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | 8.90% | +4.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 11.80% | +4.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.60% | 16.81% | +6.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.60% | 18.01% | +5.59% |
QQMG vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQMG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQMG vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.34% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.60% | 0.82% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, QQMG and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQMG has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQMG dropped -35.43% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 3-year performance, QQMG leads with 29.63% vs 22.44% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQMG has performed better with a 29.63% return vs 22.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQMG.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.34% for QQMG.
QQMG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VOO is S&P 500. QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQMG and 0.03% for VOO.
QQMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQMG and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer