QQMG vs. RSP

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QQMG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQMG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQMG returned 26.76%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for RSP. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

QQMG vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQMG achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 10.72% return.

QQMG

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: 16.21%
• 6M: 14.47%
• 1Y: 33.85%
• 3Y*: 26.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSP

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 2.23%
• YTD: 10.72%
• 6M: 9.45%
• 1Y: 18.70%
• 3Y*: 15.14%
• 5Y*: 8.63%
• 10Y*: 12.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQMG vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF	16.21%	22.16%	25.66%	55.00%	-31.56%	5.26%
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	10.72%	11.21%	12.79%	13.70%	-11.62%	4.33%

Correlation

The correlation between QQMG and RSP is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021	0.71

The correlation between QQMG and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQMG vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQMG	RSP
Technology	63.1%	20.9%
Communication Services	13.3%	3.9%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	6.4%
Healthcare	3.4%	11.1%
Industrials	1.4%	14.2%
Basic Materials	1.4%	3.9%
Utilities	0.2%	5.7%
Financial Services	0.2%	13.9%
Real Estate	0.1%	6.1%
Energy	-	4.0%

Return for Risk

QQMG vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQMG

QQMG Risk / Return Rank: 59
QQMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QQMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
QQMG Omega Ratio Rank: 57
QQMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQMG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

RSP

RSP Risk / Return Rank: 52
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 48
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQMG vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQMG	RSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.59	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	2.31	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.28	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.39	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.64	9.03	+0.61

QQMG vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQMG and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQMG vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQMG drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQMG and RSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQMG	RSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.43%	-59.92%	+24.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.67%	-7.85%	-4.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.79%	-17.81%	-4.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.03%	-0.79%	-4.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.53%	-6.64%	-2.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	2.08%	+1.44%

Volatility

QQMG vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) has a higher volatility of 9.06% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 3.59%. This indicates that QQMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQMG	RSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.06%	3.59%	+5.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.07%	8.69%	+6.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.67%	11.81%	+6.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.78%	16.20%	+7.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.78%	18.33%	+5.45%

QQMG vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQMG and RSP have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQMG vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than RSP's 1.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.37%	0.41%	0.50%	0.60%	0.82%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	1.52%	1.64%	1.52%	1.64%	1.82%	1.28%	1.64%	1.69%	2.02%	1.52%	1.20%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQMG and RSP in my portfolio?

QQMG and RSP have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQMG or RSP?

QQMG has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to RSP (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQMG dropped -35.43% vs RSP's -59.92%.

Which ETF is better, QQMG or RSP?

On 3-year performance, QQMG leads with 26.76% vs 15.14% for RSP. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQMG or RSP?

Over the 3-year period, QQMG has performed better with a 26.76% return vs 15.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQMG or RSP?

QQMG and RSP have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQMG or RSP?

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.37% for QQMG.

What is the main difference between QQMG and RSP?

QQMG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while RSP is S&P 500. QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.