QQMG vs. QB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQMG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQMG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while QB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQMG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.

Performance

QQMG vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQMG achieves a 21.86% return, which is significantly higher than QB's 10.47% return.

QQMG

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 11.51%
• YTD: 21.86%
• 6M: 20.50%
• 1Y: 44.32%
• 3Y*: 29.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QB

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQMG vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF	21.86%	13.64%
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	10.47%	5.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QQMG and QB is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.81

QQMG vs. QB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQMG	QB
Technology	62.1%	49.9%
Communication Services	13.0%	16.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	8.6%
Healthcare	3.5%	5.3%
Industrials	2.1%	3.7%
Basic Materials	1.4%	1.3%
Utilities	0.2%	1.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%
Energy	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

QQMG vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQMG

QQMG Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QQMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQMG Omega Ratio Rank: 74
QQMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQMG Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQMG vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQMG	QB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.08	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQMG	QB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	3.17	-2.43

Drawdowns

QQMG vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQMG drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQMG and QB.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQMG	QB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.43%	-1.83%	-33.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-0.30%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.61%	-0.34%	-9.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQMG	QB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.76%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.77%	5.75%	+11.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.60%	5.75%	+17.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.60%	5.75%	+17.85%

QQMG vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQMG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQMG vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than QB's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.62%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.34%	0.41%	0.50%	0.60%	0.82%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQMG and QB in my portfolio?

QQMG and QB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQMG or QB?

On fees, QQMG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQMG or QB?

QQMG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQMG or QB?

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.34% for QQMG.

What is the main difference between QQMG and QB?

QQMG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QB is Defined Outcome. QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while QB tracks Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQMG and 0.58% for QB.